REGULATORY POTENTIAL OF THE FISCAL SYSTEM OF UKRAINE: CONTENT AND FEATURES OF IMPLEMENTATION IN CONDITIONS OF ECONOMIC INSTABILITY

Keywords: taxes, the regulatory function of taxes, institutional traps, tax regulation, tax policy

Abstract

The urgency of the topic is due to the need to study the mechanism of the regulatory function of taxes through which the state actively influences the macroeconomic processes in conditions of economic instability. In conditions of economic ups and downs, the fiscal system, as a basic element of the economy, on the one hand, provides the financial foundation of the state, and on the other hand - is one of the main tools for tax policy and government intervention in the economic system. Taxes are an integral part of the fiscal system; they are an objectively existing institution of society, and one of the factors influencing social and economic development, which requires a study of its mission and content. The peculiarities of the regulatory function of taxes in the conditions of endogenous and exogenous factors of instability are revealed. It is shown that integration into the external uncertain financial space causes a number of non-standard problems for the national system of state regulation of the economy, in particular, the problem of choosing between the policy of nominal devaluation and the policy of fiscal devaluation. The article analyzes the quantitative criteria of tax policy and their impact on the effectiveness of the regulatory function of data in Ukraine during 2014-2022. Based on the analysis the conclusion is made about the predominantly fiscal focus of regulatory measures of modern state tax policy. To assess the limitations of the regulatory and instrumental role of taxes in performing the exclusive functions of the state in the economy and society, we described the institutional limitations of the regulatory function of taxes due to their connection with the institutional structure of the economy through the channels of economic sovereignty and legitimacy, trust and state debt. The content of institutional traps related to the deficit of tax revenues to the state budget is revealed, and it is shown that the tendency to avoid these traps is an institutional feature that limits the effect of tax instruments of state regulation of economic processes. Some ways of tax reform in Ukraine are given.

References

Атаманчук О.В. Регулююча функція податків та регуляторний потенціал податкової системи. Економіка та держава. 2008. № 10. С. 26–29.

Іванов Ю.Б. Регулятивний потенціал податкової системи України : монографія. Харків : ХНЕУ, 2009. 400 с.

Ярошенко І.В., Костяна О.В. Економічна криза 2014 р. в Україні та антикризова податкова політика. Бізнес-інформ. 2014. № 10. С. 318–323.

Jorgenson D.W. Capital Theory and Investment Behavior. American Economic Review. 1963. Vol. 53. № 2. P. 247–259.

Hall R.E., Jorgenson D.W. Tax policy and invest behavior. American Economic Review. 1967. Vol. 57. № 3. P. 391–414.

Гмиря В.П. Роль податків в умовах забезпечення розвитку економіки України. Фінансовий простір. 2014. № 4 (16). С. 58–62.

Єфименко Т.І. Податки в інституційній системі сучасної економіки : монографія. Київ : НАН України, Ін-т екон. та прогнозув., 2011. 688 с.

Карпінський Б.А., Залуцька Н.С. Особливості прояву економічних суперечностей у податково-бюджетній сфері економіки. Науковий вісник. 2007. Вип. 17.4. С. 156–163.

Лайко О.І. Податкові механізми регулювання відтворення інвестиційного потенціалу. Економічні інновації. 2010. Вип. 40. С. 232–243.

Тімарцев О.Ю. Розвиток функцій податків у сучасних умовах. Актуальні проблеми економіки. 2014. № 3. С. 448–454.

North D.C. Structure and Performance: The Task of Economic History. Journal of Economic Literature. 1978. Vol. 16. P. 963–978.

Stiglitz J. The Corporation Tax. Journal of Public Economics. 1976. № 5. P. 303–311.

Економіка України. URL: https://index.minfin.com.ua/ua/economy/

Доходи Державного бюджету України. URL: https://index.minfin.com.ua/ua/finance/budget/gov/income/

Schick A. Budgeting for Fiscal Risk. Government at Risk. Contingent liabilities and fiscal risk. Washington: The World Bank, 2002. P. 79.

Тищук Т. Міф та реальність: тіньова економіка в Україні. URL: https://www.obozrevatel.com/finance/business-and-finance/95617-mif-ta-realnist-tinova-ekonomika-v-ukraini.htm

Friedrich Schneider & Colin C. Williams. The Shadow Economy. The Institute of Economic Affairs. London in association with Profile Books Ltd., 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139542289

Akitoby B. Raising Revenue. URL: https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/2018/03/akitoby.htm

Nowotny E. Öffentliche Secotor: Einführung in die Finanywssenschaft. – 3 Aufl. Neubeard. Und erw. – Berlin; Heidelberg; New York u. a.: Springer. 1996. P. 107.

Tax Expenditures and Evaluations. Canada Department of Finance. 2000.

Стеценко Д.М. Податки як засіб державного впливу на соціально-економічний розвиток країни. URL: http://polka-knig.com.ua/article.php?book=705&article=37718

Haushaltsrisiken: Auswirkungen auf die Schuldenverwaltung und die Rolle der ORCB. INTOSAI – Ausschuss für öffentliche Schulden (Public Debt Committee – PDC). 2003, Februar. Р. 6–15.

Petrakis M. Taxing Times. URL: https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/2019/09/improving-tax-collection-in-greece-petrakis.htm

Atamanchuk, O.V. (2008). Regulyuyucha funktsіya podatkіv ta regulyatorniy potentsіal podatkovoi sistemi. Ekonomika ta derzhava. [Economy and state], no 10, pp. 26–29. [in Ukrainian]

Ivanov, Yu.B. (2009) Regulyativniy potentsіal podatkovoi sistemу Ukrainу [Regulatory potential of the tax system of Ukraine]. Harkіv: HNEU. [in Ukrainian]

Yaroshenko, I.V., & Kostyana, O.V. (2014). Ekonomіchna kriza 2014 r. v Ukrainі ta antikrizova podatkova polіtika. Bіznes-Inform. [Business inform], no 10, pp. 318–323. [in Ukrainian]

Jorgenson, D.W. (1963). Capital Theory and Investment Behavior. American Economic Review, no 53, pp. 247–259.

Hall, R.E., & Jorgenson, D.W. (1967). Tax policy and invest behavior. American Economic Review, vol. 57, no 3, pp. 391–414.

Gmirya, V.P. (2014). Rol podatkіv v umovah zabezpechennya rozvitku ekonomіki Ukraini. Fіnansoviy prostіr [Financial space], no 4(16), pp. 58–62. [in Ukrainian]

Еfimenko, T.I. (2011). Podatky v instytutsiyniy systemi suchasnoyi ekonomiky [Taxes in the institutional system of the modern economy]. Kyiv: MA: NAN Ukraini, In-t ekon. ta prognozuv. [in Ukrainian]

Karpіnskiy, B.A., & Zalutska, N.S. (2007). Osoblivostі proyavu ekonomіchnih superechnostey u podatkovo-byudzhetnіy sferі ekonomіkу. Naukoviy vіsnik [Scientific Bulletin], no 17.4, pp. 156–163. [in Ukrainian]

Layko, O.I. (2010). Podatkovі mehanіzmi regulyuvannya vіdtvorennya іnvestitsіynogo potentsіalu. Ekonomіchnі іnnovatsіуi. [Economic innovations], no 40, pp. 232–243. [in Ukrainian]

Tіmartsev, O.Yu. (2014). Rozvуtok funktsіy podatkіv u suchasnуh umovah. Aktualnі problemу ekonomiky [Current problems of economic], no 3, pp. 448–454. [in Ukrainian]

North, D.C. (1978). Structure and Performance: The Task of Economic History. Journal of Economic Literature, no 16, pp. 963–978.

Stiglitz, J. (1976). The Corporation Tax. Journal of Public Economics, no 5, pp. 303–311.

Ekonomika Ukrayiny [Ukraine economy]. (n.d.). Available at: https://index.minfin.com.ua/ua/economy/ [in Ukrainian]

Dokhody Derzhavnoho byudzhetu Ukrayiny [Revenues of the State Budget of Ukraine]. (n.d.). Available at: https://index.minfin.com.ua/ua/finance/budget/gov/income/ [in Ukrainian]

Schick, A. (2002). Budgeting for Fiscal Risk: Government at Risk. Contingent liabilities and fiscal risk. Washington: The World Bank.

Tischuk, T. (n.d.). Mіf ta realnіst: tіnova ekonomіka v Ukrainі. Available at: https://www.obozrevatel.com/finance/business-and-finance/95617-mif-ta-realnist-tinova-ekonomika-v-ukraini.htm [in Ukrainian]

Friedrich, Schneider & Colin, C. Williams (2013). The Shadow Economy. London, MA: London in association with Profile Books Ltd. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139542289

Akitoby, B. Raising Revenue. Available at: https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/2018/03/akitoby.htm

Nowotny E. Öffentliche Secotor: Einführung in die Finanywssenschaft. – (3 Aufl). Neubeard, Und erw., Berlin, Heidelberg, New York u. a., MA: Springer.

Tax Expenditures and Evaluations (2000). Canada: Canada Department of Finance.

Stechenko, D.M. (n.d.). Podatki yak zasіb derzhavnogo vplivu na sotsіalno-ekonomіchniy rozvitok krainу. Available at: http://polka-knig.com.ua/article.php?book=705&article=37718 [in Ukrainian]

Haushaltsrisiken: Auswirkungen auf die Schuldenverwaltung und die Rolle der ORCB (2003, Februar). INTOSAI – Ausschuss für öffentliche Schulden (Public Debt Committee – PDC), 6–15.

Petrakis, M. Taxing Times. Available at: https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/2019/09/improving-tax-collection-in-greece-petrakis.htm

Article views: 55
PDF Downloads: 57
Published
2023-10-31
How to Cite
Larina, T., Gorodetska, T., & Stepanenko, S. (2023). REGULATORY POTENTIAL OF THE FISCAL SYSTEM OF UKRAINE: CONTENT AND FEATURES OF IMPLEMENTATION IN CONDITIONS OF ECONOMIC INSTABILITY. Economic Scope, (187), 62-68. https://doi.org/10.32782/2224-6282/187-10
Section
ECONOMY AND OPERATION OF NATIONAL ECONOMY