METHODOLOGICAL BACKGROUND OF THE DECENTRALIZATION THEORIES: RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS

Keywords: decentralization, methodology, theory of separation of powers, scientific management, system approach

Abstract

The article is devoted to the disclosure of theoretical and methodological aspects of the study of decentralization. The history of the formation of the concept of decentralization is analyzed through the disclosures of the main scientific works. The criterion for distinguishing the historical framework is the content of the defining characteristics of decentralization proposed by theoretical constructions in certain periods. The history of the formation and development of the theory of decentralization is considered as a chronological sequence of three stages: political, administrative and economic. The political stage begins in the early nineteenth century and lasts until 1918. Within this framework decentralization is understood as a principle of organization of power within the country and an important factor in the democratization of society. The methodological basis is the theory of separation of powers. The second stage has the boundaries of 1918 and the late 60’s of the twentieth century. Decentralization is seen as a rational and effective algorithm for public administration. The United States is becoming the geographical center for the development of the theory of decentralization. This period is characterized by a focus on strengthening the role of the state in public administration and the corresponding advantage of centralization over decentralization. The third stage began in the 60s of the twentieth century and it continues to this day. The decentralization is understood primarily in terms of material and financial support for the effective redistribution of power between the central and local levels and the search for specific economic models of this provision. It is concluded that only fiscal independence makes local authorities truly independent of the center.

References

Гройсман В.Б. Структурно-функціональна роль децентралізації влади у процесах становлення громадянського суспільства. Ефективність державного управління. 2015. Вип. 44 (1). С. 221–229. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/efdu_2015_44%281%29__29 (дата звернення: 25.08.2021).

Де Токвиль А. Демократия в Америке / пер. с фр. ; предисл. Г.Дж. Ласки. Москва : Прогресс, 1992. 575 с.

Leroux R. Maurice Block on “Decentralization”. French Liberalism in the 19th Century: An Anthology. Routledge, 2012. Р. 255–258.

Еллинек Г. Общее учение о государстве / вступ. статья И.Ю. Козлихина. Санкт-Петербург : Юридический центр «Пресс», 2004. 752 с.

Классики теории государственного управления: американская школа / под ред. Дж. Шафритца, А. Хайда. Москва : изд-во МГУ, 2003. 800 с.

Вильсон В. Наука государственного управления. Классики теории государственного управления: американская школа / под ред. Дж. Шафритца, А. Хайда. Москва : изд-во МГУ, 2003. С. 24–43.

Уиллоуби У.Ф. Движение к бюджетной реформе в США. Классики теории государственного управления: американская школа / под ред. Дж. Шафритца, А. Хайда. Москва : изд-во МГУ, 2003. С. 51–56.

Уайт Л.Д. Введение в науку государственного управления. Классики теории государственного управления: американская школа / под ред. Дж. Шафритца, А. Хайда. Москва : изд-во МГУ, 2003. С. 63–74.

Капогузов Е.А. Роль кейнсианских идей в эволюции парадигм государственного управления. Историко-экономические исследования. 2017. Т. 18. № 2. С. 244–256.

Кейнс Дж.М. Избранные произведения / пер. с англ. ; сост. А.Г. Худокормов. Москва : Экономика, 1993. 540 с.

Кауфман Г. Административная децентрализация и политическая власть. Классики теории государственного управления: американская школа / под ред. Дж. Шафритца, А. Хайда. Москва : изд-во МГУ, 2003. С. 380–396.

Tiebout Ch. An Economic Theory of Fiscal Decentralization. Public Finances: Needs, Sources, and Utilization / Universities-National Bureau Committee for Economic Research. URL: http://www.nber.org/chapters/c2273.pdf (дата звернення: 26.08.2021).

Холодов А.С., Косенко С.Т. Гипотеза Тибу и возможности ее реализации. Студенческий научный форум : материалы IV Международной студенческой электронной научной конференции. Санкт-Петербург, 2012. URL: http://www.rae.ru/forum2012/213/1335 (дата звернення: 30.08.2021).

Oates W. Toward a second-generation theory of fiscal federalism. International Tax and Public Finance. 2005. № 12. P. 349–373.

Стале ендогенне зростання регіонів України в умовах децентралізації : монографія / за ред. І.З. Сторонянськоъ. Львів : ДУ «Інститут регіональних досліджень імені М.І. Долішнього НАН України», 2019. 501 с.

Stigler G.J. The Theory of Economic Regulation. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science. 1971. № 2. Р. 3–21.

Hroisman V.B. (2015) Strukturno-funktsionalna rol detsentralizatsii vlady u protsesakh stanovlennia hromadianskoho suspilstva [Structural and functional role of decentralization of power in the processes of formation of civil society]. Efektivnist derzhavnogo upravlinnya. 2015. № 44 (1). Р. 221–229. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/efdu_2015_44%281%29__29 (accessed 25.08.2021).

Tokvil Aleksis de (1992) Demokratiya v Amerike [Democracy in America]. Moskva: Progress.

Leroux R. (2012) Maurice Block on «Decentralization». French Liberalism in the 19th Century: An Anthology. Routledge. Р. 255–258.

Ellinek G. (2004) Obshee uchenie o gosudarstve [General doctrine of the state]. Sankt-Peterburg.

Izdatelstvo MGU (2003) Klassiki teorii gosudarstvennogo upravleniya: amerikanskaya shkola [Classics of the theory of public administration: American school]. Moskva.

Wilson V. (2003) Nauka gosudarstvennogo upravleniya [Science of public administration]. Klassiki teorii gosudarstvennogo upravleniya: amerikanskaya shkola. Moskva. Р. 24–43.

Willoughby U.F. (2003) Dvizhenie k byudzhetnoj reforme v SSHA [Moving towards budgetary reform in the United States]. Klassiki teorii gosudarstvennogo upravleniya: amerikanskaya shkola. Moskva. Р. 51–56.

White L.D. (2003) Vvedenie v nauku gosudarstvennogo upravleniya [Introduction to the Science of Public Administration]. Klassiki teorii gosudarstvennogo upravleniya: amerikanskaya shkola. Moskva. Р. 63–74.

Kapoguzov E.A. (2017) Rol kejnsianskih idej v evolyucii paradigm gosudarstvennogo upravleniya [The role of Keynesian ideas in the evolution of public administration paradigms]. Istoriko-ekonomicheskie issledovaniya. V. 18. № 2. Р. 244–256.

Keynes J.M. (1993) Izbrannye proizvedeniya [Selected works]. Moskva: Ekonomika.

Kaufman G. (2003) Administrativnaya decentralizaciya i politicheskaya vlast [Administrative decentralization and political power]. Klassiki teorii gosudarstvennogo upravleniya: amerikanskaya shkola. Moskva. Р. 380–396.

Tiebout Ch. (1961) An Economic Theory of Fiscal Decentralization. Public Finances: Needs, Sources, and Utilization / Universities-National Bureau Committee for Economic Research. URL: http://www.nber.org/chapters/c2273.pdf (accessed 26.08.2021).

Holodov A.S., Kosenko S.T. (2012) Gipoteza Tibu i vozmozhnosti ee realizacii [Tiebout’s hypothesis and the possibility of its implementation]. Studencheskij nauchnyj forum : IV Mezhdunarodnaya studencheskaya elektronnaya nauchnaya konferenciya. Sankt-Peterburg. URL: http://www.rae.ru/forum2012/213/1335 (accessed 30.08.2021).

Oates W. (2005) Toward a second-generation theory of fiscal federalism. International Tax and Public Finance. № 12. P. 349–373.

Storonyanska I.Z. (2019) Stale endogenne zrostannya regioniv Ukrayini v umovah decentralizaciyi [Sustainable endogenous development of regions of Ukraine in the minds of decentralization]. Lviv : DU Institut regionalnih doslidzhen imeni M.I. Dolishnogo NAN Ukrayini.

Stigler G.J. (1971) The Theory of Economic Regulation. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science. № 2. Р. 3–21.

Article views: 100
PDF Downloads: 85
Published
2021-11-23
How to Cite
Orlovskaya, Y., & Kiryukhin, R. (2021). METHODOLOGICAL BACKGROUND OF THE DECENTRALIZATION THEORIES: RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS. Economic Scope, (175), 13-18. https://doi.org/10.32782/2224-6282/175-2
Section
ECONOMIC THEORY AND HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT