THE PROBLEMS OF ESTIMATION OF THE BANK’S TOP MANAGEMENT STRATEGIC DECISIONS EFFICIENCY

  • V. Petiukh National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman
  • I. Voloboeva National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman
Keywords: methodology for personnel assessing, managerial decisions efficiency, Capital Asset Pricing Model, Jansen’s alpha coefficient, strategic management, Banking system of Ukraine

Abstract

Some problems of assessing the effectiveness managerial decisions of the highest (strategic) level executives in the banking business have been considered. In the commercial practice, it is common to compare the results (especially financial ones) of the entire organization. However, the final results are often influenced by a large number of external factors which often are not directly related to the competence of strategic level managers. This circumstance determines the relevance and scientific issues of the study. The methodological toolkit (Modified coefficient of Alpha-Jansen’s) for assessing the results for personnel of the strategic level of management in commercial organizations that do not belong to the corporate entity has been proposed. The financial reports of the banking sector of Ukraine and PJSC “MEGABANK” for 2013-2017 years was the empirical basis for the model approbation. Solving the scientific problem of data systematization (financial results of banking institutions), required the economicstatistical method and the method of empirical data systematization. Economicmathematical methods have been used to develop and prove the model for evaluating the effectiveness of top-management decisions. The expected quarterly return on equity and return on assets of the PJSC "MEGABANK" were targeted, which are targeted at the top-level management. By comparing the expected figures with the actual results of the current quarter, the alpha-Jensen coefficient has been got, which indicates the effectiveness for the strategic decisions of the top management If the alpha-Jensen coefficient is negative, the highest management of the bank, in this particularly market situation, has not achieved its goals. Conversely, the positive value of the coefficient indicates the effectiveness of the existing strategy and the management decisions taken by the top-management. Expected returns are expected to be based on ROA and ROE. The components for calculating the expected profitability are: average weighted profitability of the entire banking system; modified systemic risk factor (beta) – regression between the profitability of the investigated bank and the weighted average profitability of the entire banking system; risk-free rate of return. The algorithm for assessment of the effectiveness of managerial decisions at the strategic level bank management has the following sequential stages: 1) calculation of profitability for the banking system and for the investigated bank; 2) determination of the modified β-factor of the investigated bank on the basis of correlation-regression analysis; 3) determining and calculation of risk-free return; 4) calculation of the expected return of the investigated bank and assessing of the effectiveness for the management decisions. It has been considered that quantitative multidimensional models are more precise to assess the competencies of human resources, since they are more formalized and convenient for comparing and analyzing the dynamics of its indicators.

References

Arlen R. Gullickson. The Personnel Evaluation Standards: How to Assess Systems for Evaluating Educators. 2nd Edition. N.Y. Corvin Press 2009.

Adnan Shaout, Mohamed K. Yousif. Performance Evaluation – Methods and Techniques. International Journal of Computer and Information Technology. Volume 03 – Issue 05, September 2014. [Електронний ресурс] / Режим доступу: https://ijcit.com/archives/volume3/issue5/Paper030516.pdf

Campion, M.A., Fink, A.A., Ruggeberg, B.J., Carr, L., Phillips, G.M., & Odman, R.B. (2011). Doing competencies well: Best practices in competency modeling. Personnel Psychology, 64, 225-262.

Петюх В.М., Базилюк Б.Г., Герасименко О.О. Управління персоналом. Навчально- методичний посібник для самостійного вивчення дисципліни. К.: КНЕУ, 2007. – 320 с.

Nouiri, Issam. Objective optimization tool for integrated groundwater management. Water Resource Management. November 2015. Vol. 29, Issue 14.

French, Craig W. “The Treynor Capital Asset Pricing Model”. Journal of Investment Management. 2003, 1 (2): 60–72.

Capital asset pricing model. [Електронний ресурс] / Режим доступу: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capital_asset_pricing_model

John Lintner. The Valuation of Risk Assets and the Selection of Risky Investments in Stock Portfolios and Capital Budgets, John Lintner. Review of Economics and Statistics. 1965, 47:1, pp. 13–37.

Jan Mossin. “Equilibrium in a Capital Asset Market”, Econometrica, 34, 1966, pp. 768–783.

Jensen, M.C., “The Performance of Mutual Funds in the Period 1945-1964,” Journal of Finance 23, 1968, pp. 389-416. [Електронний ресурс] / Режим доступу: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=244153

Офіційний сайт Національного банку України. [Електронний ресурс] / Режим доступу: https://bank.gov.ua/control/uk/publish/category?cat_id=74208

Country Default Spreads and Risk Premiums. [Електронний ресурс] / Режим доступу: http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/New_Home_Page/datafile/ctryprem.html

Минфин. [Електронний ресурс] / Режим доступу: https://index.minfin.com.ua/ markets/eurobonds/

Arlen R. Gullickson (2009). The Personnel Evaluation Standards: How to Assess Systems for Evaluating Educators. 2nd Edition. N.Y. Corvin Press.

Adnan Shaout, Mohamed K. Yousif. Performance Evaluation – Methods and Techniques. International Journal of Computer and Information Technology. Volume 03 – Issue 05, September 2014. Available at: https://ijcit.com/archives/volume3/issue5/Paper030516.pdf (Accessed: 1 April, 2019).

Campion, M.A., Fink, A.A., Ruggeberg, B.J., Carr, L., Phillips, G.M., & Odman, R.B. (2011). Doing competencies well: Best practices in competency modeling. Personnel Psychology, 64, 225-262.

Petyukh V.M., Bazylyuk B.H., Herasymenko O.O. (2007). Upravlinnya personalom. Navchano-metodychnyy posibnyk dlya samostiynoho vyvchennya dystsypliny. KNEU, 320 pp.

Nouiri, Issam. Objective optimization tool for integrated groundwater management. Water Resource Management. November 2015. Vol. 29, Issue 14.

French, Craig W. (2003). “The Treynor Capital Asset Pricing Model”. Journal of Investment Management. 1(2): 60–72.

Sharpe, William F. (1964). “Capital Asset Prices – A Theory of Market Equilibrium Under Conditions of Risk”. Journal of Finance. XIX (3): 425–442.

John Lintner (1965). The Valuation of Risk Assets and the Selection of Risky Investments in Stock Portfolios and Capital Budgets, John Lintner. Review of Economics and Statistics. 47:1, pp. 13–37.

Jan Mossin (1966). “Equilibrium in a Capital Asset Market”, Econometrica, 34, 1966, pp. 768–783.

Jensen, M.C. “The Performance of Mutual Funds in the Period 1945-1964”, Journal of Finance” 23, 1968, pp. 389-416. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm? abstract_id=244153 (Accessed: 1 April, 2019).

The official site of National Bank of Ukraine (2019). Available at: https://bank.gov.ua/control/uk/publish/category?cat_id=74208 (Accessed: 1 April, 2019).

“Country Default Spreads and Risk Premiums” (2019). Available at: http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/New_Home_Page/datafile/ctryprem.html (Accessed: 1 April, 2019).

The official site of Ministry of Finance of Ukraine (2019). Available at: https://index.minfin.com.ua/markets/eurobonds/ (Accessed: 1 April, 2019).

Article views: 62
PDF Downloads: 40
Published
2019-04-23
How to Cite
Petiukh, V., & Voloboeva, I. (2019). THE PROBLEMS OF ESTIMATION OF THE BANK’S TOP MANAGEMENT STRATEGIC DECISIONS EFFICIENCY. Economic Scope, (144), 97-115. Retrieved from http://prostir.pdaba.dp.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/89
Section
FINANCES, BANKING AND INVESTMENT ACTIVITY