STATE REGULATION OF AGRICULTURE IN UKRAINE
Abstract
Problems of state regulation of agriculture in Ukraine are analyzed. It is shown that all problems will be solved automatically in the initial stages of agricultural reform on a market basis. It was believed that market levers operate automatically. Without the established agricultural market and its infrastructure, the liberalization of economic activity has only exacerbated the problems. In the following periods, regulatory acts were aimed at solving certain problems without defining strategic goals for agricultural development. The efforts of state agricultural management bodies are aimed at bringing regulatory policy closer to the model used in the European Union. Similar approaches are often copied without regard for the state of agriculture in Ukraine and the level of market relations. A feature of agriculture in Ukraine is the inadequate level of infrastructure of the agricultural market. Because of this, prices for agricultural products are not generated by the market, but they are formed under the monopoly influence of certain structures. Prices are very variable. It is very difficult for manufacturers to adapt to such prices. In such conditions, especially large business entities are developing rapidly. Their activities are aimed at bringing products to foreign markets where prices are more stable. State farm support programs do not provide the necessary results. There are not natural processes of transformation personal farms into commodity farms. It is proposed that the state regulatory policy can be aimed at creating self-regulatory economic systems in which prices would be formed to all participants in market relations without direct state influence. It is acceptable to organize product processing and branded trade in sales cooperatives. The need to expand the functions of wholesale markets for agricultural products is substantiated. It is expedient to direct the funds of state support for wholesale markets for agricultural products to establish branches of these markets. They would provide transport services to small producers, store products, at the direction of the owners, organize auctions. This will ensure the overcoming of isolation from market relations of small businesses, their production of competitive products.
References
Бородіна О.М. Убезпечення сільського способу життя: європейська політика, орієнтири для України. Економіка АПК. 2020. № 2. С. 20–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32317/2221-1055.202002020.
Галанець В.В. Форми та методи державного регулювання агропромислового виробництва. Право та державне управління. 2019. № 1(34). Т. 2. С. 33–39.
Гладій М.В., Лузан Ю.Я. Земельна реформа: сучасні проблеми і шляхи вирішення. Економіка АПК. 2020. № 2. С. 6–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32317/2221-1055.
Матвєєв П.М. Державне регулювання у сфері підвищення продуктивності використання ресурсного потенціалу аграрного сектору. Актуальні проблеми інноваційної економіки. 2019. № 4. С. 51–57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36887/2524-0455-2019-4-9.
Науменко А.О. Державне регулювання агропромислового комплексу України. Вчені записки ТНУ імені В.І. Вернадського. Серія «Державне управління». 2019. Т. 30(69). № 4. С. 93–97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32838/2663-6468/2019.4/17.
Онегіна В.М., Шибаєва Н.В. Інституційна основа аграрної політики: українські реалії й досвід США та ЄС. Економіка АПК. 2016. № 1. С. 18–23.
Прунцева Г.О. Аналіз ефективності державної підтримки сільськогосподарських підприємств. Економiка i органiзацiя управлiння. 2020. № 1(37). С. 79–88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31558/2307-2318.2020.1.8.
Саблук П.Т., Лузан Ю.Я. Аграрна політика та чинники її реалізації. Економіка АПК. 2019. № 10. С. 6–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32317/2221-1055.201910006.
Borodina O.M. (2020). Ubezpechennia silskoho sposobu zhyttia: yevropeiska polityka, oriientyry dlia Ukrainy [Ensuring the rural way of life: European policy, guidelines for Ukraine]. Ekonomika APK, no. 2, pp. 20 – 32. (in Ukrainian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.32317/2221-1055.202002020.
Halanets V.V. (2019). Formy ta metody derzhavnoho rehuliuvannia ahropromyslovoho vyrobnytstva [Forms and methods of state regulation of agro-industrial production]. Pravo ta derzhavne upravlinnia, no. 1 (34), t. 2, pp. 33 – 39. (in Ukrainian).
Hladii M.V., Luzan Yu.Ya. (2020). Zemelna reforma: suchasni problemy i shliakhy vyrishennia [Land reform: current problems and solutions]. Ekonomika APK, no. 2, pp.6 – 19. (in Ukrainian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.32317/2221-1055.
Matvieiev P.M. (2019). Derzhavne rehuliuvannia u sferi pidvyshchennia produktyvnosti vykorystannia resursnoho potentsialu ahrarnoho sektora [State regulation in the field of increasing the productivity of the resource potential of the agricultural sector]. Aktualni problemy innovatsiinoi ekonomiky, no. 4, pp. 51 – 57. (in Ukrainian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.36887/2524-0455-2019-4-9.
Naumenko A.O. (2019). Derzhavne rehuliuvannia ahropromyslovoho kompleksu Ukrainy [State regulation of the agro-industrial complex of Ukraine]. Vcheni zapysky TNU imeni V. I. Vernadskoho. Seriia: Derzhavne upravlinnia, t. 30 (69), no. 4, pp. 93 – 97. (in Ukrainian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.32838/2663-6468/2019.4/17.
Onehina V.M., Shybaieva N.V. (2016). Instytutsiina osnova ahrarnoi polityky: ukrainski realii y dosvid SShA ta YeS [Institutional basis of agrarian policy: Ukrainian realities and experience of the USA and the EU]. Ekonomika APK, no. 1, pp. 18 – 23. (in Ukrainian).
Pruntseva H.O. (2020). Analiz efektyvnosti derzhavnoi pidtrymky silskohospodarskykh pidpryiemstv [Analysis of the effectiveness of state support of agricultural enterprises]. Ekonomika i orhanizatsiia upravlinnia, no. 1 (37), pp. 79 – 88. (in Ukrainian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.31558/2307-2318.2020.1.8.
Sabluk P.T., Luzan Yu.Ya. (2019). Ahrarna polityka ta chynnyky yii realizatsii [Agrarian policy and factors of its implementation]. Ekonomika APK, no. 10, pp. 6 – 17. (in Ukrainian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.32317/2221-1055.201910006.
