INNOVATIVE CORE-PERIPHERY OF EU COUNTRIES DEVELOPMENT
Abstract
The article examines the factors of innovative development of the EU’s and Ukraine’s economic systems, which affect the success of integration interactions and sustainable economic growth. It has been proved, based on a comparison of different theoretical approaches that the modern core-peripheral development of social systems in the integration association corresponds to a dynamic hierarchical structure. The authors believe that the drivers of this development are innovation processes in economic systems. It has been found that generating and problem-based approaches are the most adequate approaches for characterizing and assessing the innovative core-peripheral development of countries. A system of ten indicators for assessing the innovative development of countries has been proposed and a cluster analysis of the EU and Ukraine countries according to these indicators and for the period from 2005 to 2018 has been carried out. The hierarchical structure of the innovative European space has been proved and six clusters of countries have been selected. The identified differences between the clusters of countries allowed them to be grouped into three blocks of the core-peripheral model: the innovation center; innovation province and innovation periphery. The architecture of the “Innovation Center-Peripherality” model has been proposed. That model has revealed the number and quality of countries “transitions” between clusters (dynamics of the composition of countries) and a stable list of “innovation center” countries, which is almost unchanged over the period. The comparative analysis of innovative development determinants for the countries from each of core-peripheral model blocks has been carried out. It has been proved that Ukraine, as one of the countries of the “innovation periphery” bloc, for the sake of successful European integration and convergence of economic development must develop a strategy for transition to the “innovation province” bloc through the transition to the nearest (border) cluster. The key guidelines of the most adequate strategy of innovative development of Ukraine have been substantiated.
References
Пилипенко І. Центро-периферійна організація суспільства та адміністративно-територіальна реформа. Економічна та соціальна географія : Збірник наукових праць. Київ, 2015. Вип. 73. С. 44–50.
Концепція «центр-периферія». URL: https://stud.com.ua/26388/geografiya/kontseptsiya_tsentr_periferiya (дата звернення: 10.02.2020).
Черторижський В.М. Закордонний досвід дослідження проблем центро-периферійних залежностей (прикордонний аспект). Соц.-ек.проблеми сучас. періоду України. 2013. Вип. 6(104). C. 434–440.
Hirschman A. The Strategy of Economic Development. New Haven : Yale University Press, 1958.
Furtado C. Les nouvel les sources du pouvoir dans l’ordreé conomique international. «Revue Tiers Monde», P., janviermars 1980.
Wallerstein I. M.The Modern World-System. Studies in Social Discontinuity. New York : Academic Press, 1974.
Wallerstein I. M. The End of the World as We Know It. Social Science for the Twenty-First Century. Minneapolis : University of Minnesota Press, 1999.
Myrdal G. Economic Theory and Underdeveloped Regions. London : Duckworth, 1957.
Friedmann J. Regional development policy. Boston : Mass. Inst. Techn., 1966. 317 p.
Rokkan S. Citizens, Elections, Parties. Approaches to the Comparative Study of the Processes of Development. Oslo : Universitets for laget, 1970.
Роккан С., Дерек В. Урвин Политика территориальной идентичности. Исследование по европейскому регионализму. Логос. 2003. № 6(40). С. 117‒132.
World System History: The Social Science of Long-term Change / Ed. by R. A. Denemark, J. Friedman, В. K. Gills, G. Modelski. L.; N. Y., 2000.
Преображенский Ю. В. Подходы к выявлению центра и перифериию URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/podhody-k-vyyavleniyu-tsentra-i-periferii/viewer (дата звернення: 10.02.2020).
Readiness for the Future of Production Report 2018. URL: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/FOP_Readiness_Report_2018.pdf (дата звернення: 12.02.2020).
The Global Innovation Index 2017: Innovation feeding the world. Ithaca, Fontainebleau and Geneva: Cornell University, INSEAD and WIPO, 2017. URL: https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_gii_2017.pdf (дата звернення: 12.02.2020).
The Global Innovation Index 2018: Energizing the world with innovation. Ithaca, Fontainebleau and Geneva: Cornell University, INSEAD and WIPO, 2018. URL: https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_gii_2018.pdf (дата звернення: 12.02.2020).
The Global Innovation Index 2019: Creating healthy lives – the future of medical innovation. Ithaca, Fontainebleau and Geneva: Cornell University, INSEAD and WIPO, 2019. URL: https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_gii_2019.pdf (дата звернення: 12.02.2020).
European Innovation Scoreboard 2017. European Comission, 2017. URL: https://ec.europa.eu/docsroom/documents/24829 (дата звернення: 12.02.2020).
European Innovation Scoreboard 2018. European Comission, 2018. URL: https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/8e458033-74fc-11e8-9483-01aa75ed71a1/language-en/format-PDF/source-99539237 (дата звернення: 12.02.2020).
European Innovation Scoreboard 2019. European Comission, 2019. URL: https://ec.europa.eu/docsroom/documents/38781 (дата звернення: 12.02.2020).
Стан інноваційної діяльності та діяльності у сфері трансферу технологій в Україні у 2018 році : аналітична довідка / Т.В. Писаренко, Т.К. Кваша та ін. Київ : УкрІНТЕІ, 2019. 80 с. URL: https://mon.gov.ua/storage/app/media/innovatsii-transfer-tehnologiy/2019/07/03/stan-innov-diyaln-2018f.pdf (дата звернення: 12.02.2020).
Інноваційний вимір курсу України на євроінтеграцію. Економіка і прогнозування. 2018. № 2. С. 135–150.
Pilipenko I. (2015). Centro-periferijna organizaciya suspilstva a administrativno-teritorialna reforma [Central-peripheral organiza¬tion of society and administrative-territorial reform]. Economic and social geography: Collection of scientific works, no. 73, pp. 44–50.
(n.d.) Koncepciya “centr-periferiya” [The concept of "center-periphery"]. Available at: https://stud.com.ua/26388/geografiya/kontseptsiya_tsentr_periferiya (accessed February 10, 2020). (in Ukrainian)
Chertorizhskij V. M. (2013). Zakordonnij dosvid doslidzhennya problem centro-periferijnih zalezhnostej (prikordonnij aspekt) [Foreign experience of research of problems of centro-peripheral dependences (foreign aspect)]. Social and economic problems of the modern period of Ukraine, vol. 6, no. 104, pp. 434–440.
Hirschman A. (1958). The Strategy of Economic Development. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Furtado C. (1980). Les nouvel les sources du pouvoir dans l’ordree conomique international [New sources of power in the inter¬national economic order]. Paris: Revue Tiers Monde.
Wallerstein I. M. (1974). The Modern World-System. Studies in Social Discontinuity. New York: Academic Press.
Wallerstein I. M. (1999). The End of the World as We Know It. Social Science for the Twenty-First Century. Minneapolis: University of MinnesotaPress.
Myrdal G. (1957). Economic Theory and Underdeveloped Regions. London: Duckworth.
Friedmann J. (1966). Regional development policy. Boston: Mass. Inst. Techn.
Rokkan S. (1970). Citizens, Elections, Parties. Approaches to the Comparative Study of the Processes of Development. Oslo: Universitets for laget.
Rokkan S., Derek V., Urvin (2003). The policy of territorial identity. Research on European regionalism. Logos, vol. 6, no. 40, pp. 117‒132.
R. A. Denemark, J. Friedman, V. K. Gills, G. Modelski. L. (Eds) (2000). World System History: The Social Science of Long-term Change. N. Y.
Preobrazhenskij Yu. V. (n.d.). Podhody k vyyavleniyu centra i periferii [Approaches to identifying the center and periphery]. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/podhody-k-vyyavleniyu-tsentra-i-periferii/viewer (accessed Febuary 10, 2020). (in Ukrainian)
(2018) Readiness for the Future of Production Report 2018. Available at: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/FOP_Readiness_Report_2018.pdf (accessed February 12, 2020).
INSEAD and WIPO (2017). The Global Innovation Index 2017: Innovation feeding the world. Ithaca, Fontainebleau and Geneva: Cornell University. Available at: https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_gii_2017.pdf (accessed February 12, 2020).
INSEAD and WIPO (2018). The Global Innovation Index 2018: Energizing the world with innovation. Ithaca, Fontainebleau and Geneva: Cornell University. Available at: https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_gii_2018.pdf (accessed February 12, 2020).
INSEAD and WIPO (2019). The Global Innovation Index 2019: Creating healthy lives - the future of medical innovation. Ithaca, Fontainebleau and Geneva: Cornell University. Available at: https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_gii_2019.pdf (accessed February 12, 2020).
European Commission (2017). European Innovation Scoreboard 2017. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/docsroom/documents/24829 (accessed February 12, 2020).
European Commission (2018). European Innovation Scoreboard 2018. Available at: https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/8e458033-74fc-11e8-9483-01aa75ed71a1/language-en/format-PDF/source-99539237 (accessed February 12, 2020).
European Commission (2019). European Innovation Scoreboard 2019 Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/docsroom/docu¬ments/38781 (accessed February 12, 2020).
T. V. Pisarenko, T. K. Kvasha (2019). Stan innovacijnoyi diyalnosti ta diyalnosti u sferi transferu tehnologij v Ukrayini u 2018 roci: analitichna dovidka [The state of innovation and activity in the field of technology transfer in Ukraine in 2018: analytical reference]. Kyiv: UkrINTEI. Available at: https://mon.gov.ua/storage/app/media/innovatsii-transfer-tehnologiy/2019/07/03/stan-innov-diyaln-2018f.pdf (accessed February 12, 2020). (in Ukrainian)
Haustov V. K. (2018). Innovacijnij vimir kursu Ukrayini na yevrointegraciyu [Innovative dimension of Ukraine's course for European integration]. Economics and Forecasting, no. 2, pp. 135–150.
