CONCEPTUAL DIRECTIONS OF CHINA’S INNOVATION ACTIVITIES STIMULATION IN THE GLOBALIZATION CONDITIONS
Abstract
The conceptual foundations research results of the People's Republic of China (PRC) innovation system transformation and the determination of the directions for stimulating its innovative activity have been presented in the paper. The purpose of the article is the disadvantages identification of the PRC’s scientific and technological policy and based on its generalizations, determination of the main directions for improving the legislation of the PRC’s in the field of science and technology, as well as the substantiation of scientific and practical recommendations for stimulating the innovative activities of the PRC in the context of globalization. In the course of the research, the disadvantages of the scientific and innovation policy of the PRC are analyzed and it is pointed out that the awareness of these problems and tasks led to the transformation of China's state innovation strategy towards comprehensive support of innovative entrepreneurship. One of the successful manifestations of this program is the rapid development of new organizational technical and financial forms that stimulate and support their innovative activity, namely: hackspace, business incubators, business angels and private venture investment funds, focused mainly on innovative small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) financing. The main directions of improving the legislation of the PRC in the field of science and technology have been identified, namely: highly qualified personnel potential increase by expanding accessibility and improving the quality of education; a combination of a centralized state policy in the field of science and technology with the involvement of private capital to the scientific and technological sector; inclusion of research organizations in the structure of production companies and holdings, as well as encouraging the introduction of new technologies in production; popularization of science and technology, the formation in the public mind of the idea of the extreme importance of the scientific and technological base for the successful and harmonious development of the country as a whole. It is concluded that the dynamics of the development of new elements in the landscape of innovative entrepreneurship in China is interdependent. Joint R&D activities in Chinese realities will contribute to increasing the economic success of innovative projects, and the expansion of innovative activity in the field of small and medium-sized businesses will serve as a powerful impetus for the development of the private venture capital market in China.
References
World Bank: China. URL: http://www.worldbank.org/en/country/china/data
Изотов Д. А. Опыт интеграции науки и образования в странах Северо-Восточной Азии // Инновации. 2013. № 1. C. 23-37.
Пивоварова Э. П. Китай вступает в «решающий» этап модер-низации // Азия и Африка сегодня. 2015. № 8. С. 47-55.
Sigurdson J. Technology and Science in Peopled Republic of China. UK. Oxford. 2018. Р. 11-27.
Huang C., Sharif N. Global technology leadership: The case of China // Science and Public Policy. 2016. Vol. 43. Р. 23-39.
Hubler W. Innowacje w Chinach: od starozytnosci do wyzwan dnia dzisiejszego // Kwartalnik naukowy. Akademia Finansow I Biznesu Vistula. Warszawa. 2013. № 2. Р. 12-19.
Кондратьев Н. Д. Большие циклы экономической конъюнктуры: Доклад // Проблемы экономической динамики. Москва: Экономика, 1989. С. 172‒226. 523 с.
Попова М. В. Международный опыт построения индексов инновационного развития // Современные научные исследования и инновации. 2013. № 3 [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://web.snauka/issues/2013/03/23033.
Schumpeter J. The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest and the Business Cycle. New Brunswick (U.S.A) and London (U.K.). 1934 (2008). 389 p.
Гончаров А. С. Трансформация высшего профессионального образования на основе смены технологического уклада в экономике [Електронний ресурс]. URL : http://www.science-education/102-5979.
Гончаренко Н., Булгакова О., Псьота Т. Криптовалюта як інноваційний інструмент міжнародних розрахунків в умовах глобальної фінансизації // Бізнес Інформ. 2018. №11. С. 441-449.
Довгаль О. А., Таран А. Ю. Теоретичні аспекти технологічного лідерства національних економік // Проблеми економіки. 2016. № 2. C. 5–12.
Коблов Е. Н. Курсом в 6-й технологический уклад [Електронний ресурс]. URL : http://www.nanonewsnet.ru/articles/2015/.
Матюшенко І. Ю. Перспективи технології розвитку конвергенції у країнах світу та Україні для вирішення глобальних проблем: монографія. Харків, 2017. 448 с.
Matyushenko I., Danova M., Feoktystova O., Melnyk R. Formation of teams of performers of projects at innovative enterprises within the framework of the Industry 4.0 concept // International Journal of Supply Chain Management. 2019. Vol. 8 (4). Р. 962-974.
Jablonski L., Jablonski M., Fedirko O. Building knowledge-based economy in the EU: methodological background and policy solutions // International Economic Policy. 2019. №2. Р. 7-33.
Шенкар О. Китай: век XXI. Развитие Китая, его влияние на мировую экономику и геополитическое равновесие. Днепропетровск: Баланс Бизнес Букс, 2015. 193 с.
Main Science and Technology Indicators. Outlook. OECD, 2019. [Електронний ресурс]. URL : https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=MSTI_PUB.
The rating of the countries of the world in terms of global competitiveness according to imd information about the study and its results [Електронний ресурс]. URL : http://gtmarket.ru/ratings/the-imd-world-competitiveness-yearbook/info.
Global Innovation Index. [Електронний ресурс]. URL : https://www.globalinnovationindex.org.
Xiaoping Dan The main issues of modern China [Електронний ресурс]. URL: http://www.M.I.R. (Modernization. Innovation. Research). 2016. Vol. 7, No. 3. P. 119-124.
China Science and Technology Development Report. Ministry of Science and Technology of the People’s Republic of China. Beijing: Chinese S&T Literature Press, 2019. 362 р.
National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) // Ministry of Science and Technology of the People’s Republic of China. [Електронний ресурс]. URL: http://www.most.gov.cn/eng/pro-grammes1/200610/t20061009_36223.htm.
China’s Report of Technology Foresight (Summary). People’s Republic of China // National Research Center for Science and Technology for Development. Research Group of Technology Foresight. September 2019. [Електронний ресурс]. URL: http://www.foresight.org.cn.
World Bank: China. URL: http://www.worldbank.org/en/country/china/data
Izotov, D. (2013). Opy`t integraczii nauki i obrazovaniya v stranakh Severo-Vostochnoj Azii [Experience in integrating science and education in North-East Asia]. Innovaczii – Innovation, 1, 23-37 [in Russian].
Pivovarova, E. (2015). Kitaj vstupaet v «reshayushhij» etap modernizaczii [China enters “crucial” phase of modernization]. Aziya i Afrika segodnya - Asia and Africa today, 8, 47-55[in Russian].
Sigurdson, J. (2018). Technology and Science in Peopled Republic of China. UK. Oxford, 11-27
Huang, C., Sharif , N. (2016). Global technology leadership: The case of China. Science and Public Policy, Vol. 43, 23-39
Hubler, W. (2013). Innowacje w Chinach: od starozytnosci do wyzwan dnia dzisiejszego [Innovation in China: from antiquity to the challenges of today]. Kwartalnik naukowy. Akademia Finansow I Biznesu Vistula - Scientific quarterly. Vistula Academy of Finance and Business. Warszawa, 2, 12-19 [in Polish].
Kondrat`ev, N. (1989). Bol`shie czikly ekonomicheskoj kon`yunktury: Doklad [Large cycles of economic conditions: Report]. Problemy ekonomicheskoj dinamiki - Problems of economic dynamics. Moskva: Ekonomika, 172‒226 [in Russian].
Popova, M. (2013). Mezhdunarodnyj opyt postroeniya indeksov innovaczionnogo razvitiya [International experience in building indices of innovative development]. Sovremennye nauchnye issledovaniya i innovaczii - Modern research and innovation, 3. Retrieved from: http://web.snauka.ru/issues/2013/03/23033 [in Russian].
Schumpeter, J. 1934 (2008). The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest and the Business Cycle. New Brunswick (U.S.A) and London (U.K.)
Goncharov, A. Transformacziya vysshego professional`nogo obrazovaniya na osnove smeny tekhnologicheskogo uklada v ekonomike [Transformation of higher professional education on the basis of a change in technological structure in the economy]. Retrieved from: http://www.science-education.ru/102-5979.
Goncharenko, N., Bulgakova O., Ps`ota T. (2018). Kryptovalyuta yak innovaczijnij instrument mizhnarodnikh rozrakhunkiv v umovakh global`noyi finansizacziyi [Cryptocurrency as an international innovation tool in the minds of global financialization]. Bizness Inform – Business Inform, 11, 441-449 [in Ukrainian].
Dovgal`, O., Taran, A. (2016). Teoretichni aspekti tekhnologichnogo liderstva naczional`nikh ekonomik [Theoretical aspects of the technological leadership of the national economies]. Problemi ekonomiki - Problems of the economy, 2, 5-12 [in Ukrainian].
Koblov, E. Kursom v 6-j tekhnologicheskij uklad [Course to the 6th technological mode]. Retrieved from: http://www.nanonewsnet.ru/articles/2015/ [in Russian].
Matyushenko, I. (2017). Perspektivi tekhnologiyi rozvytku konvergencziyi u krayinakh svitu ta Ukrayini dlya vyrishennya global`nykh problem: monografiya [Perspectives of technological development of convergence in the world countries and Ukraine for the global problems solution: monograph]. Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].
Matyushenko, I., Danova, M., Feoktystova, O., Melnyk, R. (2019). Formation of teams of performers of projects at innovative enterprises within the framework of the Industry 4.0 concept. International Journal of Supply Chain Management. Vol. 8 (4), 962-974
Jablonski, L., Jablonski, M., Fedirko, O. (2019). Building knowledge-based economy in the EU: methodological background and policy solutions. International Economic Policy. №2, 7-33
Shenkar, O. (2015). Kitaj: vek XXI. Razvitie Kitaya, ego vliyanie na mirovuyu ekonomiku i geopoliticheskoe ravnovesie [China: Century XXI. The development of China, its impact on the global economy and geopolitical balance]. Dnepropetrovsk: Balans Biznes Buks.
Main Science and Technology Indicators. Outlook. OECD, 2019. Retrieved from: https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=MSTI_PUB
The rating of the countries of the world in terms of global competitiveness according to imd information about the study and its results (2019). Retrieved from: http://gtmarket.ru/ratings/the-imd-world-competitiveness-yearbook/info
Global Innovation Index (2019). Retrieved from: https://www.globalinnovationindex.org
Xiaoping, D. (2016). The main issues of modern China. Retrieved from: http://www.M.I.R. (Modernization. Innovation. Research). Vol. 7, No. 3, 119-124
China Science and Technology Development Repor (2019). Ministry of Science and Technology of the People’s Republic of China. Beijing: Chinese S&T Literature Press
National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program). Ministry of Science and Technology of the People’s Republic of China. Retrieved from: http://www.most.gov.cn/eng/pro-grammes1/200610/t20061009_36223.htm.
China’s Report of Technology Foresight (Summary). People’s Republic of China (2019). National Research Center for Science and Technology for Development. Research Group of Technology Foresight. Retrieved from: http://www.foresight.org.cn.
