MECHANISMS OF REGULATION OF DIGITIZATION PROCESSES TO ENSURE NATIONALLY ROOTED RESILIENCE OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Abstract
The widespread use of digital technologies has become a key factor in the development of the modern economy. However, the potential risks associated with the digitalization process can weaken the stability and security of economic development, which necessitates strengthening the mechanisms of state regulation of the processes of development, implementation, and use of digital technologies through political support and the organization of appropriate regulatory and legal support. To form the theoretical basis of the research, general scientific methods were used. Based on the cross-national analysis, a comparison of the ethical and legal principles of the use of digital technologies was carried out and the priorities and peculiarities of their state regulation in individual countries of the world were determined. A systemic approach was used to identify the interrelationships between state regulation, legal support, and the use of digital technologies. Based on the use of the empirical method and the method of induction, general regularities are determined, the results are summarised and conclusions are drawn. The necessity of using the ethical and legal principles of regulating the use of digital technologies to ensure rooted resilience, increase the welfare of citizens and increase the competitiveness of the economy has been proven. There is a well-founded need to implement OECD principles into Ukraine's legislation and regulatory framework. The key tasks of the organization of state regulation, control, and supervision of the processes of development, implementation and use of digital technologies are defined, the principles of forming the legal framework in the field of digital technologies and the main components that ensure competitive advantages and digital sovereignty are formulated. It has been proven that international ethical and legal norms and standards of international organizations should be the institutional platform for the formation of effective state policy mechanisms in the field of regulation of digitalization processes. The developed recommendations can be used by the government and relevant ministries to effectively use the potential of digital technologies to increase the country's competitiveness and digital sovereignty.
References
Економічні суперечності глобалізації та локалізації в умовах гібридної війни та післявоєнної реконструкції: монографія / за ред. академіка Гриценка А.А.; НАН України, ДУ “Інститут економіки та прогнозування НАН України”. Київ, 2022. 636 c. URL: http://ief.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Ec-superech-globaliz-ta-localiz-v-umomah-gibryd-viyny.pdf
Буковинський С.А. та ін. Банківська система України на шляху євроінтеграції / за ред. С.А. Буковинського. Київ : ЦНД НБУ, 2015. 496 с.
Recommendation of the Council on Artificial Intelligence. OECD. 2019. URL: https://oecd.ai/en/assets/files/OECD-LEGAL-0449-en.pdf
Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. UNESCO. Adopted on 23 November 2021. SHS/BIO/PI/2021/1. 2022. 43 р. URL: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000381137
The state of implementation of the OECD AI Principles four years on. OECD Artificial Intelligence Papers. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/835641c9-en
Вінникова Н.А. Державні стратегії розвитку та впровадження штучного інтелекту. Регіональні студії. 2022. № 28. С. 51–57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2663-6170/2022.28.9
Міщенко В.І. Механізми регулювання обміну даними. Причорноморські економічні студії. 2022. № 75. С. 37–45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32843/bses.75-6
Timmers P. Ethics of AI and cybersecurity when sovereignty is at stake. Minds and Machines. 2019. № 29 (4). P. 635–645. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-019-09508-4
Дзюблюк О.В. та ін. Теорія і практика грошового обігу та банківської справи в умовах глобальної фінансової нестабільності: монографія. Тернопіль : ФОП Осадца Ю.В., 2017. 298 с.
Ulnicane I., Knight W., Leach T. et al. Framing governance for a contested emerging technology: Insights from AI policy. Policy and Society. 2021. № 40 (2). P. 158–177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2020.1855800
Hagendorf T. The ethics of AI ethics. Minds and Machines. 2020. № 30 (1). P. 99–120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-020-09517-8
Mishchenko S., Naumenkova S., Ivanov V., Lysenko R. Growing discoordination between monetary and fiscal policies in Ukraine. Banks and Bank Systems. 2019. № 14 (2). Р. 40–49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21511/bbs.14(2).2019.04
Floridi L. Translating principles into practices of digital ethics: Five risks of being unethical. Philosophy & Technology. 2019. № 32 (2). P. 185–193. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-019-00354-x
Cath C., Wachter S., Mittelstadt, B. et al. Artificial Intelligence and the ‘Good Society’: the US, EU, and UK approach. Science and Engineering Ethics. 2018. № 24. P. 505–528. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9901-7
Ess C. Interpretative pros hen pluralism: From computer-mediated colonization to a pluralistic intercultural digital ethics. Philosophy & Technology. 2020. № 33 (4). Р. 551–569. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-020-00412-9
Wong P.-H. Cultural differences as excuses? Human rights and cultural values in global ethics and governance of AI. Philosophy & Technology. 2020. № 33 (4). Р. 705–715. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-020-00413-8
Feijóo C., Kwon Y., Bauer J. M. et al. Harnessing Artificial Intelligence (AI) to increase wellbeing for all: The case for a new technology diplomacy. Telecommunications Policy. 2020. № 44 (6). 101988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2020.101988
Науменкова С., Міщенко С., Тіщенко Є. Фінансові інструменти убезпечення від політичних ризиків у проектному фінансуванні. Вісник Київського національного університету імені Тараса Шевченка. Економіка. 2016. № 10. С. 6–17.
Відновлення та реконструкція повоєнної економіки України: наукова доповідь. НАН України, ДУ «Ін-т екон. та прогнозув. НАН України». Київ: 2022. 305 с. URL: http://ief.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Vidnovlennja-ta-reconstrukcsja-povojennoji-economiky.pdf
Міщенко В.І. Управління кібербезпекою в системі забезпечення національно укоріненої стійкості економічного розвитку. Економічна теорія. 2023. № 1. С. 47–72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/etet2023.01.047
Artificial Intelligence Act: deal on comprehensive rules for trustworthy AI. European Parliament. Press Releases. 2023. URL: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20231206IPR15699/artificial-intelligence-act-deal-on-comprehensive-rules-for-trustworthy-ai
Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 October 2022 on a Single Market for Digital Services and amending Directive 2000/31/EC (Digital Services Act) (Text with EEA relevance). 32022R2065. PE/30/2022/REV/1. 2022. URL: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/2065/oj
Keping Y. Governance and good governance: A new framework for political analysis. Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences. 2018. Vol. 11. Is. 1. P. 1–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40647-017-0197-4
Roberts H., Cowls J., Casolari F. et al. Safeguarding European values with digital sovereignty: An analysis of statements and policies. Internet Policy Review. 2021. № 10 (3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.14763/2021.3.1575
Науменкова С.В. Цифрові валюти у контексті суспільної довіри до грошей. Фінансово-кредитна діяльність: проблеми теорії та практики. 2018. № 2 (25). С. 305–316. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18371/fcaptp.v2i25.136869
Міщенко В.І. Стратегічне управління процесами цифрової трансформації економіки. Економіка України. 2022. № 1. С. 67–81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/economyukr.2022.01.067
Гриценко А.А. Інформаційно-цифровий етап розвитку соціально-економічних систем. Економіка України. 2022. № 1. С. 29–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/economyukr.2022.01.029
Науменкова С.В. Цифрова фінансова інклюзія для досягнення Цілей сталого розвитку. Вісник Київського національного університету імені Тараса Шевченка. Економіка. 2023. № 1. С. 102–112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2667.2023/222-1/13
Reviglio U., Alunge R. I am datafed because we are datafed: An Ubuntu perspective on (relational) privacy. Philosophy & Technology. 2020. № 33 (4). P. 595–612. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-020-00407-6
Міщенко В.І., Науменкова С.В., Міщенко С.В. Ефективність функціонування процентного каналу монетарної трансмісії в Україні. Бізнес-навігатор. 2021. № 4 (65). С. 111–117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32847/business-navigator.65-19
The Artificial Intelligence (AI) Literacy Act. US Congress. 2022. URL: https://bluntrochester.house.gov/uploadedfiles/20231215aibill.pdf
Emily A. et al. Machine Learning and Phone Data Can Improve Targeting of Humanitarian Aid. Nature. 2022. № 603. Р. 864–870. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04484-9 9
Міщенко В.І., Науменкова С.В., Міщенко С.В. Наслідки пандемії COVID-19 та необхідність цифрової трансформації вищої освіти. Вища школа. 2022. № 3–4. С. 7–34.
Про стимулювання розвитку цифрової економіки в Україні. Закон України. від 15.07.2021 р. № 1667-IX. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1667-20#Text
Grytsenko A. A. et al. (2022) Ekonomichni superechnosti hlobalizatsii ta lokalizatsii v umovakh hibrydnoi viyny ta povoennoi rekonstruktsii [Economic contradictions of globalization and localization in the context of hybrid war and post-war reconstruction]. Kyiv: NAN Ukrainy, DU “Instytut ekonomiky ta prohnozuvannja NAN Ukrainy”. Available at: http://ief.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Ec-superech-globaliz-ta-localiz-v-umomah-gibryd-viyny.pdf (in Ukrainian)
Bukovinsky S. A. et al. (2015) Bankivska systema Ukrainy na shljakhu evrointehratsii [The banking system of Ukraine on the path of European integration]. Kyiv: CND NBU. (in Ukrainian)
OECD (2019) Recommendation of the Council on Artificial Intelligence. Available at: https://oecd.ai/en/assets/files/OECD-LEGAL-0449-en.pdf
UNESCO (2022) Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. Available at: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000381137
OECD. (2023). The state of implementation of the OECD AI Principles four years on. OECD Artificial Intelligence Papers. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/835641c9-en
Vinnikova N.A. (2022). Derzhavni stratehii rozvytku ta vprovadzhennja shtuchnoho intelektu [State strategies for the development and implementation of artificial intelligence]. Rehionalni studii, no. 28, pp. 51–57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2663-6170/2022.28.9
Mishchenko V. I. (2022) Mekhanizmy rehulyuvannja obminu danymy [Mechanisms for regulating data exchange]. Prychornomorski ekonomichni studii, no. 75, pp. 37–45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32843/bses.75-6
Timmers P. (2019) Ethics of AI and cybersecurity when sovereignty is at stake. Minds and Machines, no. 29 (4), pp. 635–645. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-019-09508-4
Dzyublyuk O. V. et al. (2017) Teoriia i praktyka hroshovoho obihu ta bankivskoi spravy v umovakh globalnoi nestabilnosti [Theory and practice of monetary circulation and banking in the conditions of global financial instability]. Ternopil: Osadtsa Yu. V. (in Ukrainian)
Ulnicane I., Knight W., Leach T. et al. (2021). Framing governance for a contested emerging technology: Insights from AI policy. Policy and Society, no. 40 (2), pp. 158–177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2020.1855800
Hagendorf T. (2020) The ethics of AI ethics. Minds and Machines, no. 30 (1), pp. 99–120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-020-09517-8
Mishchenko S., Naumenkova S., Ivanov V., Lysenko R. (2019) Growing discoordination between monetary and fiscal policies in Ukraine. Banks and Bank Systems, no. 14 (2), pp. 40–49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21511/bbs.14(2).2019.04
Floridi L. (2019) Translating principles into practices of digital ethics: Five risks of being unethical. Philosophy & Technology, no. 32 (2), pp. 185–193. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-019-00354-x
Cath C., Wachter S., Mittelstadt, B. et al. (2018). Artificial Intelligence and the ‘Good Society’: the US, EU, and UK approach. Science and Engineering Ethics, no. 24, рр. 505–528. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9901-7
Ess C. (2020) Interpretative pros hen pluralism: From computer-mediated colonization to a pluralistic intercultural digital ethics. Philosophy & Technology, no. 33 (4), pp. 551–569. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-020-00412-9
Wong P.-H. (2020) Cultural differences as excuses? Human rights and cultural values in global ethics and governance of AI. Philosophy & Technology, no. 33 (4), рр. 705–715. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-020-00413-8
Feijóo C., Kwon Y., Bauer J. M. et al. (2020). Harnessing Artificial Intelligence (AI) to increase wellbeing for all: The case for a new technology diplomacy. Telecommunications Policy, no. 44 (6). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2020.101988
Naumenkova S., Mishchenko S., Tishchenko I. (2016). Finansovi instrumenty ubezpechennia vid politychnykh ryzykiv u proektnomu finansuvanni [Financial Instruments for Safeguarding Against Political Risks in Project Financing]. Visnyk Kyivskoho natsionalnoho universytety imeni Tarasa Shevchenka. Ekonomika, no. 10, рр. 6–17.
Grytsenko A. A. et al. (2022). Vidnovlennia ta rekonstruktsiia povoiennoi ekonomiky Ukrainy: naukova dopovid [Restoration and reconstruction of the post-war economy of Ukraine: scientific report]. Kyiv: In-t ekon. ta prohnozuv. NAN Ukrainy. Available at: http://ief.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Vidnovlennja-ta-reconstrukcsja-povojennoji-economiky.pdf (in Ukrainian)
Mishchenko V. I. (2023) Upravlinnja kiberbezpekoyu v systemi zabezpechennja natsionalno ukorinenoi stiykosti ekonomichnoho rozvytku [Cybersecurity management in the system of ensuring nationally rooted sustainability of economic development]. Ekonomichna Teorija, no. 1, pp. 47–72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/etet2023.01.047
EC (2023) Artificial Intelligence Act: deal on comprehensive rules for trustworthy AI. European Parliament. Press Releases. 09-12-2023. Available at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20231206IPR15699/artificial-intelligence-act-deal-on-comprehensive-rules-for-trustworthy-ai
EC (2022) Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 October 2022 on a Single Market for Digital Services and amending Directive 2000/31/EC (Digital Services Act) (Text with EEA relevance). 32022R2065. PE/30/2022/REV/1. Available at: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/2065/oj
Keping Y. (2018) Governance and good governance: A new framework for political analysis. Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, no. 11 (1), pp. 1–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40647-017-0197-4
Roberts H., Cowls J., Casolari F. et al. (2021) Safeguarding European values with digital sovereignty: An analysis of statements and policies. Internet Policy Review, no. 10 (3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.14763/2021.3.1575
Naumenkova S. V. (2018). Tsyfrovi valyuty u konteksti suspilnoi doviry do hroshey [Digital Currencies in the Context of Public Trust in Money]. Finansovo-kredytna dijalnist: problem teorii ta praktyky, no. 2 (25), pp. 305–316. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18371/fcaptp.v2i25.136869
Mishchenko V. I. (2022) Stratehichne upravlinnja protsesamy tsyfrovoi transformatsii ekonomiky [Strategic management of the processes of digital transformation of the economy]. Ekonomika Ukrainy, no. 1, pp. 67–81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/economyukr.2022.01.067
Grytsenko А. А. (2022) Informatsiyno-tsyfrovui etap rozvytku sotsislno-ekonomichnykh system [Information and Digital Stage of Development of Socio-Economic Systems]. Еkonomika Ukrainy, no. 1, pp. 29–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/economyukr.2022.01.029
Naumenkova S. V. (2023) Tsyfrova finansova inklyuzija dlja dosjahnennja Tsiley staloho rozvytku [Digital Financial Inclusion to Achieve the Sustainable Development Goals]. Visnyk Kyivskiho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Tarasa Shevchenka, no. 1, pp. 102–112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2667.2023/222-1/13
Reviglio U., Alunge R. (2020) I am datafed because we are datafed: An Ubuntu perspective on (relational) privacy. Philosophy & Technology, no. 33 (4), pp. 595–612. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-020-00407-6
Mishchenko V. I., Naumenkova S. V., Mishchenko S. V. (2021) Efektyvnist funktsionuvannja protsentnoho kanalu monetarnoi transmisii v Ukrauni [Efficiency of the Interest Rate Channel of Monetary Transmission in Ukraine]. Biznes-navihator, no. 4, pp. 111–117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32847/business-navigator.65-19
US Congress (2022) The Artificial Intelligence (AI) Literacy Act. Available at: https://bluntrochester.house.gov/uploadedfiles/20231215aibill.pdf
Emily A. et al. (2022) Machine Learning and Phone Data Can Improve Targeting of Humanitarian Aid. Nature, no. 603 (7903), pp. 864–870. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04484-9
Mishchenko V., Naumenkova S., Mishchenko S. (2022) Naslidky pandemii COVID-19 ta neobkhidnist tsyfrovoi transformatsii vyshchoi osvity [Consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic and the need for digital transformation of higher education]. Vyshcha shkola, no. 3–4, pp. 7–34.
VRU (2021) Pro stymulyuvannja rozvytku tsyfrovoi ekonomiky v Ukraini [On stimulating the development of the digital economy in Ukraine]. No. 1667-IX. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1667-20#Text
