STRATEGIZING OF POSTWAR DEVELOPMENT OF INFANT MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES
Abstract
The article studies the role and approaches to strategizing the post-war development of innovative activities in the industrial sector. It was determined that the emergence of new industries that supply innovative high-tech products is an integral part of the qualitative technological restructuring of the national industry, which is able to lead the Ukrainian economy in the post-war period along the vector of long-term economic growth. The experience of developed countries, which due to differences in approaches to supporting the innovative activities (highly coordinated – in Germany and low-coordinated – in Great Britain and the USA) and the characteristics of the institutional environment, had uneven success in creating strategic industries, was considered. The inflexibility of labor relations and the active promotion of the development of the local innovation ecosystem along with the implementation of a number of large-scale programs such as "BioRegio" allowed Germany to strengthen the position of innovative entrepreneurship in the field of biotechnology over time. In Great Britain, the biotechnological industry, due to the lack of government regulation and support for start-ups, has deteriorated its position on the world market. Developing countries, Brazil and China, demonstrate the need to implement a comprehensive strategy for growing new industries. Partial solutions and insufficient incentives in Brazil have become the reason for inhibiting the development of high-tech goods markets. And thorough planning in China gradually pushes new industries in their innovative development. Recommendations have been developed for the formation of tasks and the use of separate tools for strategic planning of the post-war recovery and industrial sector restructuring in Ukraine. They include strategizing the development of new industries during military operations, the introduction of technological innovations, state innovative procurement of domestic defense and civil developments, international production cooperation with partners from the main markets – the EU, the Middle East, the USA, Asia, and the use of a number of state industrial policy instruments to stimulate the scaling up of production and exports of new industries, as well as attracting investments and highly qualified personnel.
References
Ляховець О. Державно-приватне партнерство у вищій освіті як інституційна складова модернізації економіки. Інноваційна економіка. 2014. №4 (53). С. 71-78.
Ципліцька О.О. Інституційні механізми модернізації промислового сектору національної економіки : дис. … д-ра екон. наук : 08.00.03 / Державна установа «Інститут економіки та прогнозування НАН України». Київ, 2020. 450 с.
Best Practices in State and Regional Innovation Initiatives: Competing in the 21st Century / Ed. by Charles W. Wessner. Washington, National Academies Press. 2013. 256 p.
Casper S., Kettler H. National institutional frameworks and the hybridization of entrepreneurial business models: the German and UK biotechnology sectors. Industry and Innovation. 2001. Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 5-30. DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13662710120034383
Cooke P. Biotechnology clusters in the UK: lessons from localisation in the commercialisation of science. Small Business Economics. 2001. Vol. 17 (1-2). P. 43–59
Edwards J., Fischer K. Banks, Finance and Investment in Germany. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2008. 268 p.
Hirschman A. The Strategy of Economic Development. 1958. Yale University Press. 230 p.
Hoshi T., Kushida K.E., Dasher R., Harada N., Okazaki T. Institutional Foundations for Innovation-Based Economic Growth / National Institute for Research Advancement (NIRA) Report. 2015. 73 p. URL: http://www.nira.or.jp/pdf/e_1503report.pdf
Jiang H., Cao Y. Research on strategic emerging industries boosting high quality economic. NETID 2020, E3S Web of Conferences 235, 02011. 2021. URL: https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202123502011
Koblianska I., Kalachevska L. Problems of the Institutional-Legal and Organizational Provision of Systemic Innovation Policy: the Case of Ukraine. Comparative Economic Research. Central and Eastern Europe. 2019. Vol. 22, No. 1. pp. 53-73. Doi: http://doi.org/10.2478/cer-2019-0004
Reversal of fortune: an assessment of the German biotechnology sector in comparative perspective / ed. Silvia J. S. American Institute for Contemporary German Studies, The John Hopkins University, 1999. 50 p.
Reynolds E.B., Uygun Y. Strengthening advanced manufacturing innovation ecosystems: The case of Massachusetts. Technological Forecasting & Social Change. 2018. No. 136, pp. 178-191. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.06.003
Rocha C. F., Mamédio D. F., Quandt C. O. Startups and the innovation ecosystem in Industry 4.0. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management. 2019. Vol. 31, Issue 12, pp. 1474-1487. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2019.1628938
Technology Transfer Systems in the United States and Germany / National Academy of Engineering; eds. Abramson H.N., Reid P.P., Schmoch U., Encarnacao J. Washington DC: National Academy Press, 1997. 448 p.
Zang L., Xiong F., Lao X., Gao Y. Does governance efficiency matter for national innovative capacity? One tale from different countries. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management. 2019. Vol. 31, Issue 2, pp. 239-252. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2018.1493450
Liakhovets O. (2014). Derzhavno-pryvatne partnerstvo u vyschiy osviti yak instytutsiyna skladova modernizatsiyi ekonomiky [Public-private partnership in higher education as an institutional component of the economy modernization]. Innovatsiyna ekonomika, no. 4, vol. 53, pp. 71-78. (in Ukrainian)
Tsyplitska O. O. (2020). Instytutsiini mekhanizmy modernizatsii promyslovoho sektoru natsionalnoi ekonomiky [Institutional mechanisms of modernization of the industrial sector of the national economy]. (PhD Thesis), State Organization «Institute for Economics and Forecasting of NAS of Ukraine», Kyiv. (in Ukrainian)
Wessner W. C., ed. (2013). Best Practices in State and Regional Innovation Initiatives: Competing in the 21st Century. Washington, National Academies Press.
Casper S., Kettler H. (2001). National institutional frameworks and the hybridization of entrepreneurial business models: the German and UK biotechnology sectors. Industry and Innovation, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 5-30.
Cooke P. (2001). Biotechnology clusters in the UK: lessons from localisation in the commercialisation of science. Small Business Economics, vol. 17, no. 1-2, pp. 43–59
Edwards J., Fischer K. (2008). Banks, Finance and Investment in Germany. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hirschman A. (1958). The Strategy of Economic Development. Yale University Press.
Hoshi T., Kushida K.E., Dasher R., Harada N., Okazaki T. (2015). Institutional Foundations for Innovation-Based Economic Growth. National Institute for Research Advancement (NIRA) Report. Retrieved from: http://www.nira.or.jp/pdf/e_1503report.pdf
Jiang H., Cao Y. (2021). Research on strategic emerging industries boosting high quality economic. NETID 2020, E3S Web of Conferences 235, 02011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202123502011
Koblianska I., Kalachevska L. (2019). Problems of the Institutional-Legal and Organizational Provision of Systemic Innovation Policy: The Case of Ukraine. Comparative Economic Research. Central and Eastern Europe, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 53-73.
Silvia J. S., ed. (1999). Reversal of fortune: an assessment of the German biotechnology sector in comparative perspective. American Institute for Contemporary German Studies, The John Hopkins University, 50 p.
Reynolds E.B., Uygun Y. (2018). Strengthening advanced manufacturing innovation ecosystems: The case of Massachusetts. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, no. 136, pp. 178-191.
Rocha C. F., Mamédio D. F., Quandt C. O. (2019). Startups and the innovation ecosystem in Industry 4.0. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, vol. 31, issue 12, pp. 1474-1487.
Abramson H.N., Reid P.P., Schmoch U., Encarnacao J., eds. (1997). Technology Transfer Systems in the United States and Germany. National Academy of Engineering. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
Zang L., Xiong F., Lao X., Gao Y. (2019). Does governance efficiency matter for national innovative capacity? One tale from different countries. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, vol. 31, issue 2, pp. 239-252.
