THEORETICAL AND METHODOLOGICAL PRINCIPLES OF THE INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES SECTOR INFLUENCE ON PUBLIC GOODS REPRODUCTION
Abstract
The key theoretical and methodological approaches to understanding the importance of the sector of information and communication technologies (SICT) have been found out to improve the public goods reproduction in the national economy.The purpose is to determine the main theoretical and methodological principles of influencing the SICTon the public goods permanent production in the national economy. In the article, such scientific methods as deduction and induction, analysis and synthesis, comparison and analogiesare used. It has been found that using the achievements of the SICT positively affects the ability to meet the needs in the public goods for group of people when they are aware them as a specific purpose of the activity aimed at improving human development, solving the modern environmental problems and providing progressive changes in the economic system.The author has substantiated that the development of the SICT improves the effectiveness of the interaction of the state, firms and households in this sphere through provision of information services, software development, intensification of using computer equipment and technology by their consumers and manufacturers.Additionally, it has been defined that this enhances communication between the public goods reproduction and economic agents engaged in this activity at the national and regional levels, taking into account such features of the digitalization in the economy of Ukraine as a gradual development of digital literacy, improving the quality of Internet services and the formation of digital social norms. Based on influencing the SICT on the public goods reproduction, the main theoretical and epistemological vectors of the content disclosure for the economic nature of this process by classification criteria are specified. The author has determined that improving the effectiveness of the public goods reproduction process is connected with intensification of using information and communication technologies through the development of various Internet platforms of the interaction of their producers and users, increasing digital literacy of consumers, provision of information and consulting services, implementation of measures to ensure the availability of hardware and the formation of a culture of digital interaction.
References
Besley T., Ghatak M. Public-Private Partnerships for the Provision of Public Goods: Theory and Applications to NGOs. The Development Economics Discussion Papers Series. 1999. № 17. August. 38 p.
Deacon R. Public Good Provision under Dictatorship and Democracy. Public Choice. 2009. Vol. 139. № 1–2. P. 241–262.
Gehlbach S. Electoral Institutions and the National Provision of Local Public Goods. Quarterly Journal of Political Science. 2007. Vol. 2. № 1. P. 5–25.
Saha S. Democratic Institutions and Provision of a Public Goods. Economics Working Paper Series. 2007. Vol. 55. № 3. URL: http://www.econ.ucsb.edu/papers/wp02-07.pdf (Last accessed: 18.11.2021).
Williams A. The Optimal Provision of Public Goods in a System of Local Government. The Journal of Political Economy. 1966. V. 74. P. 18–33.
Zhuravskaya E. Incentives to Provide Local Public Goods: Fiscal Federalism, Russian Stile. Journal of Public Economics. 2000. № 76. Р. 337–368.
Грабова О.Н. Экономические отношения в производстве общественных благ : автореф. дис. ... канд. экон. наук : 08.00.01 ; Костромск. госуд. ун-т им. Н.А. Некрасова. Кострома, 2003. 24 с.
Котельников А.А. Государственная поддержка воспроизводства опекаемых благ : автореф. дис. ... канд. экон. наук : 08.00.01 ; Саратов. госуд. соц.-эконом. ун-т. Саратов, 2010. 20 с.
Винокурова Ю.А. Проблемы реформирования воспроизводства общественных благ в Российской Федерации : автореф. дис. ... канд. экон. наук : 08.00.01 ; Казанский госуд. ун-т им. В.И. Ульянова-Ленина. Казань, 2001. 19 с.
Линева Н.К. Особенности локальных общественных благ в транзитивной экономике : автореф. дис. … канд. экон. наук : 08.00.01 ; Южно-Уральский госуд. ун-т. Челябинск, 2004. 25 с.
Федорова Ю.В. Глобальные тенденции производства общественных благ : автореф. дис. … д-ра экон. наук : 08.00.01 «Экономическая теорія» ; Саратовский госуд. социально-эконом. ун-т. Саратов, 2005. 36 с.
Водяненко О.И. Инвестиции в производство общественных благ : тенденции и особенности развития в России : автореф. дис. ... канд. экон. наук : 08.00.01 ; Саратовский государственный социально-экономический ун-т. Саратов, 2012. 18 с.
Рубинштейн А.Я. Экономика общественных преференций. Структура и эволюция социального интереса : монография. Санкт-Петербург : Алетейя, 2008. 560 с.
Кічурчак М. Концепт відтворення суспільних благ в економічній теорії. Вісник Київського національного університету імені Тараса Шевченка. 2018. № 1(196). С. 33–40.
Кічурчак М. Економіко-гносеологічні засади визначення сутності суспільних благ. Економічний форум. 2018. № 4. С. 4–13.
Lupia A., Sin G. Which Public Goods Are Endangered?: How Evolving Communication Technologies Affect The Logic of Collective Action. Public Choice. 2003. Vol. 117. № 3–4. P. 315–331. DOI: 10.1023/B:PUCH.0000003735.07840.c7.
Bhatnagar, S. Public Service Delivery: Role of Information and Communication Technology in Improving Governance and Development Impact. ADB Economics Working Paper Series. 2014. № 139. 36 р.
Besley, T., &Ghatak, M. (1999). Public-PrivatePartnershipsfor the Provision of Public Goods: Theory and Applications to NGOs. The Development Economics Discussion Papers Series, 17, August.
Deacon, R. (2009). Public Good Provision under Dictatorship and Democracy. Public Choice, 139 (1–2), 241–262. DOI 10.1007/s11127-008-9391-x.
Gehlbach, S. (2007). Electoral Institutions and the National Provision of Local Public Goods. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 2 (1), 5–25.
Saha, S. (2007). Democratic Institutions and Provision of a Public Goods. Economics Working Paper Series, 55 (3). URL: http://www.econ.ucsb.edu/papers/wp02-07.pdf (Last accessed: 18.11.2021).
Williams A. The Optimal Provision of Public Goods in a System of Local Government. The Journal of Political Economy. 1966. V. 74. P. 18–33.
Zhuravskaya, E. (2000). Incentives to Provide Local Public Goods: Fiscal Federalism, Russian Stile. Journal of Public Economics, 76, 337–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(99)00090-0.
Grabova, O.N. (2003). Ekonomicheskie otnosheniia v proizvodstve obshchestvennykh blag [Economic relations in the production of public goods] (Abstract of PhD thesis). Kostromsk. gosud. un-t im. N.A.Nekrasova, Kostroma. [in Russian]
Kotelnikov, A.A. (2010). Gosudarstvennaia podderzhka vosproizvodstva opekaemykh blag [Thestate support for reproduction of meritgoods](Abstract of PhD thesis). Saratov. gosud. soc.-ekonom. un-t, Saratov. [in Russian]
Vinokurova, Iu.A. (2001). Problemy reformirovaniia vosproizvodstva obshchestvennykh blag v Rossiiskoi Federatcii [Problems of reforming the reproduction of public goods in the Russian Federation] (Abstract of PhD thesis). Kazanskij gosud. un-t im. V.I.Ul'yanova-Lenina, Kazan'. [inRussian]
Lineva, N.K. (2004). Osobennosti lokalnykh obshchestvennykh blag v tranzitivnoi ekonomike [The features of local public goods in the transitive economy](Abstract of PhD thesis). YuzhnoUral'skij gosud. un-tet, Chelyabinsk. [in Russian]
Fedorova, Iu.V. (2005). Globalnye tendentcii proizvodstva obshchestvennykh blag [Global trends in public goodsproduction] (Abstract of doctor thesis). Saratovskij gosud. social'no-e'konom. un-tet, Saratov. [inRussian]
Vodianenko, O.I. (2012) Investitcii v proizvodstvo obshchestvennykh blag: tendentcii i osobennosti razvitiia v Rossii [Investments in the production of public goods: trends and features of development in Russia](Abstract of PhD thesis). Saratov. gos. soc.-ekonom. un-t, Saratov. [inRussian]
Rubinshtein, A.Ia. (2008). Ekonomika obshchestvennykh preferentcii. Struktura i evoliutciia sotcialnogo interesa [Economics of public preferences. Structure and evolution of cocial interest]. SPb.: Aleteiia. 560 s. [in Russian]
Kichurchak, M. (2018) Kontsept vidtvorennia suspilnykh blah v ekonomichnii teorii [Concept of public goods reproduction in economics]. Visnyk Kyivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Tarasa Shevchenka [Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Economics], 1 (196), 33–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2667.2018/196-1/5. [inUkrainian]
Kichurchak, M. (2018). Ekonomiko-hnoseolohichni zasady vyznachennia sutnosti suspilnykh blah [The economic-gnoseology principles of the public goods essence determination]. Ekonomichnyi forum [Economic forum], 4, 4–13. [inUkrainian]
Lupia, A., Sin, G. (2003). Which Public Goods Are Endangered?: How Evolving Communication Technologies Affect The Logic of Collective Action. Public Choice, 117 (3–4), 315–331. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PUCH.0000003735.07840.c7.
Bhatnagar, S. (2014).Public Service Delivery: Role of Information and Communication Technology in Improving Governance and Development Impact. ADB Economics Working Paper Series, 139.
