KEY INDICATORS OF REGULATION OF THE ENTERPRISE RESOURCE SECURITY LEVEL

  • Mariia Pankova Donetsk National Technical University
Keywords: resources, security, regulation, typology, cluster and discriminant analysis, indicators

Abstract

In modern conditions of aggravated competition, the state of each enterprise and its position in the market largely depend on the nature of resource management, that is, the ability to effectively use and develop its resource base. At the same time, under the influence of numerous factors, the situation in all areas is constantly changing, objectively causing the need for various regulatory measures. The work identifies the key parameters of the enterprise functioning, which to a large extent form their own style of resource management, and thus these are priority in case of need for a targeted adjustment of the existing approaches to the use of the resource base. The study is based on the hypothesis of the existence of several characteristic (basic) types of enterprises' behavior with resources, which can be identified and to which all business entities belong to a certain degree of approximation. Each of these types has the own stable and unique features that largely determine the level of resource security. Thus, the vectors for adjusting the behavior style with resources of each enterprise, on the one hand, are broad through their identity, and on the other hand, these features can significantly limit them. In such conditions, the regulation of the level of resource security, without taking into account the specifics of the style of behavior with resources (that already formed), is conceptually limited and makes it impossible to successfully implement the necessary measures. The consideration of the typical affiliation (of a certain style) makes it possible to correctly determine the strategic guidelines for the further enterprise's development in terms of ensuring an appropriate level of resource security. The study methodical basis is multidimensional methods of statistical analysis: cluster – to establish the basic types of enterprises, and discriminant – to further check the quality of the typology obtained and determine the variables that have the greatest separation power in terms of the behavior style with resources of business entities. The study results should contribute to an increase in the degree of the scientific validity of recommendations for the assessment and effective regulation of the resource security level of business entities.

References

Kravchenko S., Zanizdra M. Typology of basic supranational innovative systems. Economy of Industry. 2019. № 1 (85). С. 5–29.

Рзаєв Г.І., Няйко С.М. Ресурсна безпека підприємства та обґрунтування аналітичних процедур її підтримки в економічному аналізі. Вісник Хмельницького національного університету. Економічні науки. 2017. № 6 (1). С. 172–175.

Кравченко С.І., Корнєва О.В. Оцінка достатності інноваційного потенціалу підприємства. Наукові праці Донецького національного технічного університету. Серія: економічна : зб. наук. пр. Донецьк : ДонНТУ, 2009. Вип. 36–1. С. 125–132.

Кравченко С.И. Основные направления повышения эффективности управления инновационной деятельностью на отечественных предприятиях. Наукові праці Донецького національного технічного університету. Серія: економічна : зб. наук. пр. Донецьк : ДонНТУ, 2004. Вип. 76. С. 156–162.

Mieshkov A., Kravchenko S., Bondaryeva I., Kvilinskyi O. Modern features of satisfying the needs of the labor market in specialists in the financial sphere with in-depth knowledge of investment and innovation. European Cooperation. 2017. Vol. 3. No. 22. PP. 19–32.

Марченко О.М., Оробчук М.Г. Головне завдання досягнення ресурсної безпеки сільськогосподарського виробництва України. Науковий вісник Львівського державного університету внутрішніх справ. 2017. № 1. С. 106–118.

Гущенская Н.Д., Анфалова А.Ю. Методика определения интегрального показателя ресурсной безопасности сельскохозяйственных организаций. Вестник Курганской ГСХА. 2018. № 1. С. 7–9.

Kocisova K., Misankova M. Discriminant analysis as a tool for forecasting company’s financial health. Proceedings of the 2-dn International Scientific conference “Contemporary Issues in Business, Management and Education 2013”. 2014. Vol. 110. PP. 1148–1157.

Кравченко С.І., Корнєва О.В. Обліково-аналітичне забезпечення управління інтелектуальним капіталом. Вісник національного технічного університету «Львівська політехніка». Менеджмент та підприємництво в Україні: етапи становлення і проблеми розвитку : зб. наук. пр. Львів : ВНУ «Львівська політехніка», 2009. № 647. С. 393–398.

Kravchenko S., Zanizdra M. (2019) Typology of basic supranational innovative systems. Economy of Industry, no. 1 (85), pp. 5–29.

Rzayev G.I., Nyayko S.M. (2017) Resursna bezpeka pidpryiemstva ta obgruntuvannia analitychnykh protsedur yii pidtrymky v ekonomichnomu analizi [Resource safety of the enterprise and representation of analytical procedures of its support in economic analysis]. Bulletin of Khmelnytsky National University. Economic sciences, no. 6 (1), pp. 172–175.

Kravchenko S.I., Korneva O.V. (2009) Otsinka dostatnosti innovatsiinoho potentsialu pidpryiemstva [Assessment of the adequacy of the innovative potential of the enterprise]. Scientific works of Donetsk National Technical University. Series: economic, vol. 36–1, pp. 125–132.

Kravchenko S.I. (2004) Osnovnyye napravleniya povysheniya effektivnosti upravleniya innovatsionnoy deyatelnostyu na otechestvennykh predpriyatiyakh [The main directions of improving the efficiency of innovation management at domestic enterprises]. Science of the Donetsk National Technical University. Series: economic, vol. 76, pp. 156–162.

Mieshkov A., Kravchenko S., Bondaryeva I., Kvilinskyi O. (2017) Modern features of satisfying the needs of the labor market in specialists in the financial sphere with in-depth knowledge of investment and innovation. European Cooperation, vol. 3, no. 22, pp. 19–32.

Marchenko O.M., Orobchuk M.G. (2017) Holovne zavdannia dosiahnennia resursnoi bezpeky silskohospodarskoho vyrobnytstva Ukrainy [The main task of achieving resource security of agricultural production in Ukraine]. Scientific Bulletin of Lviv State University of Internal Affairs, no. 1, pp. 106–118.

Gushchenskaya N.D., Anfalova A.Yu. (2018) Metodika opredeleniya integralnogo pokazatelya resursnoy bezopasnosti selskokhozyaystvennykh organizatsiy [Methodology for determining the integral indicator of resource security of agricultural organizations]. Bulletin of the Kurgan State Agricultural Academy, no. 1, pp. 7–9.

Kocisova K., Misankova M. (2014) Discriminant analysis as a tool for forecasting company’s financial health. Proceedings of the 2-dn International Scientific conference “Contemporary Issues in Business, Management and Education 2013”, vol. 110, pp. 1148–1157.

Kravchenko S.I., Korneva O.V. (2009) Oblikovo-analitychne zabezpechennia upravlinnia intelektualnym kapitalom [Accounting and analytical support of intellectual capital management]. Bulletin of the National Technical University "Lviv Polytechnic". Management and entrepreneurship in Ukraine: stages of formation and problems of development, no. 647, pp. 393–398.

Article views: 117
PDF Downloads: 85
Published
2021-08-31
How to Cite
Pankova, M. (2021). KEY INDICATORS OF REGULATION OF THE ENTERPRISE RESOURCE SECURITY LEVEL. Economic Scope, (172), 43-47. https://doi.org/10.32782/2224-6282/172-7
Section
ECONOMY AND ENTERPRISE MANAGEMENT