THE ESSENCE OF THE CONCEPT OF «SOCIAL ESPONSIBILITY» IN ECONOMIC THEORY

  • Serhiy Korniievskyi Prydniprovska State Academy of Civil Engineering and Architecture
  • Veronika Chala Prydniprovska State Academy of Civil Engineering and Architecture https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2233-2335
Keywords: responsibility, social responsibility, corporate social responsibility, the focus of social responsibility, stages of social responsibility development

Abstract

The scientific approaches to defining the essence of the concept of "social responsibility" have been summarized in the article and its author's interpretation have been proposed. The theoretical and methodological approaches to formulating the concept of "responsibility" and its derivative, "social responsibility," have been examined. A historical retrospective of scholars' views on the understanding of this phenomenon has been provided. It has been noted that social responsibility is based on an individual's responsibility and, in the process of their social activities, acquires a certain focus on achieving economic goals, which are practically specified as the fundamental values regarding the economic-functional purpose of a collective subject of social action. It has been proved that social responsibility plays a key role in the modern world, where business, civil society, and the state collaborate to achieve sustainable development. Thanks to the expanded role of the concept of "social responsibility" in economic theory and practice, it has been concluded that the concept of social responsibility has become an integral part of strategic business management. The author emphasizes that nowadays enterprises have been understanding about not only maximizing profit but also taking into account the social and environmental aspects of their activities. Real socially responsible enterprises contribute to sustainable consumption by offering environmentally friendly products and services and reducing their negative impact on the environment. It has been noticed that socially responsible businesses often invest in social projects such as education, healthcare, and poverty alleviation, contributing to improving the quality of life for the population. The author believes that businesses which prioritize social responsibility often become more competitive in the market by increasing the trust of consumers and investors. It has been proved that social responsibility has become a key tool in achieving sustainable development, taking into account the needs of current generations without compromising the opportunities of future generations. The concept of social responsibility in economic theory reflects the essence and importance of balancing profitability of enterprises with their contribution to social and environmental development. It has been concluded that the development of this concept contributes to the creation of more resilient and equitable economic systems that enjoy the support of consumers, investors, and society as a whole.

References

Дейч М.Є. Соціальна відповідальність: теоретико-методологічні основи змістовного визначення. Социальная экономика. 2013. № 1. С. 91–99.

Весь Аристотель. Електронна книга. Київ : Мультимедійне видавництво Стрельбицького, 2019.

Калинець К.С. Теоретико-методологічні основи розуміння соціальної відповідальності. Соціально-економічні проблеми сучасного періоду України. 2016. Вип. 2. С. 43–47.

Кант И. Основы метафизики нравственности. Київ : ТОВ «Видавничий союз Андронум», 2020. 90 с.

Платон. Держава. Львів : Апріорі, 2021. 464 с.

Резнік Н. Соціальна відповідальність бізнесу: сутнісно-теоретичні аспекти. Журнал європейської економіки. 2014. Т. 13, № 3. С. 296–303.

Соціальна відповідальність: теорія і практика розвитку : монографія / [А.М. Колот, О.А. Грішнова та ін.] ; за наук. ред. д-ра екон. наук, проф. А.М. Колота. Київ : КНЕУ, 2012. 501 с.

Читанка з філософії: У 6 книгах. Київ : Довіра, 1993. Кн. 6: Зарубіжна філософія ХХ століття. С. 131–139.

Ярова В.В. Категорія «соціальна відповідальність»: теоретичні джерела, еволюція підходів до визначення, практика розвитку. Економіка. Проблеми економічного становлення. 2013. Вип. 4. С. 63–69.

Bowen, H.R. Social responsibilities of the businessman. NewYork : Harper& Row, 1953.

Carroll A. The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons. 1991. № 34 (4). Р. 39–48.

Fridman M. The social responsibility of business is to increase its prоfits. The New York Times magazine. 1970.

Deich M. (2013). Sotsialna vidpovidalnist: teoretiko-metidologichni osnovi zmistovnogo visnachennia [Social responsibility: theoretical and methodological basis of meaningful definition]. Social economy. No. 1. P. 91–99.

Ves Aristotel (2019). Elektronna kniga [The entire Aristotle, e-book]. Kyiv: Strelbytsky Multimedia Publishing House.

Kalynets K. (2016). Teoretiko-metodologichni osnovi rozuminnia sotsialnoi vidpovidalnosti [Theoretical and methodological foundations of understanding of social responsibility]. Socio-economic problems of the modern period of Ukraine. Issue 2. P. 43–47.

Kant I. (2020). Osnovi metafiziki nravstvennosti [Kant I. Fundamentals of the metaphysics of morality]. Kiev: LLC “Vidavnichy Union Andronum” 90 p.

Platon (2021). Derzhava State. Lviv: Apriori, 464 p.

Reznik N. (2014). Sotsialna vidpovidalnist bisnesu: sutnisno-teiretichni aspekti [Social responsibility of business: substantive and theoretical aspect]. Journal of European Economics. Vol. 13, No. 3. P. 296–303.

Sotsialna vidpovidalnist: Teoria i praktika rozvitku: monografia (2012) [Social responsibility: theory and practice of development: monograph] / A.M. Kolot, O.A. Grishnova, etc.] ; for sciences ed. Dr. Econ. Sciences, Prof. A.M. Kolota. Kyiv: KNEU. 501 p.

Chitanka z filosofii (1993) [Reader in philosophy] In 6 books. Kyiv: Dovira, Book. 6: Foreign philosophy of the 20th century. P. 131–139.

Yarova, V. (2013). Kategoria “Sotsialna vidpovidalnist”: teoretichni dgerela, evolutsia pidhodiv do viznachennia, praktika rozvitku [The category of "social responsibility": theoretical sources, evolution of approaches to definition, development practice] Economics. Problems of economic formation. Issue 4. Pp. 63–69.

Bowen, H.R. (1953). Social responsibilities of the businessman NewYork: Harper& Row.

Carroll A. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons. № 34 (4). Рp. 39–48.

Fridman M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its prоfits. The New York Times magazine.

Article views: 55
PDF Downloads: 66
Published
2023-10-31
How to Cite
Korniievskyi, S., & Chala, V. (2023). THE ESSENCE OF THE CONCEPT OF «SOCIAL ESPONSIBILITY» IN ECONOMIC THEORY. Economic Scope, (187), 9-14. https://doi.org/10.32782/2224-6282/187-1
Section
ECONOMIC THEORY AND HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT