ПОКАЗНИКИ ІННОВАЦІЙНОГО РОЗВИТКУ ПРОМИСЛОВОЇ ГАЛУЗІ ТА НАЦІОНАЛЬНОЇ ЕКОНОМІКИ: ОГЛЯД НАУКОВОЇ ЛІТЕРАТУРИ
Анотація
Невід’ємною характеристикою сучасної цивілізації є зростання рівня інноваційних процесів, які потребують релевантної оцінки їх ефективності. Метою даної статті дослідження показників, що оцінюють інноваційний розвиток на галузевому та національному рівнях для їх класифікації й кращого розуміння сутності в наукових роботах, які представлено в наукометричній базі даних Scopus. Було зроблено систематичний огляд 37 публікацій за період 2010-2023 рр. За результатами дослідження удосконалено класифікацію показників інноваційного розвитку, які згруповано у чотири категорії. Кожна категорія показників окреслена концептуальними рамками виміру, що у подальшому може сприяти розробкам нових індикаторів інноваційного розвитку. Показники для оцінки інновацій необхідно підбирати в залежності від проблеми, яку необхідно вирішити. Крім того, це має бути система показників, що дозволить приймати оптимальні рішення.
Посилання
Клименко К.В., Савостьяненко М.В. Методичні підходи до оцінки результативності та ефективності науково-дослідної діяльності: світова практика. Наукові праці НДФІ. 2020. № 3. С. 20–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33763/npndfi2020.03.020.
OECD / Eurostat. Oslo Manual 2018: Guidelines for Collecting, Reporting and Using Data on Innovation, 4th Edition. The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities, 2018. OECD Publishing, Paris / Eurostat, Luxembourg. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264304604-en
Abreu M., Grinevich V., Kitson M., Savona M. Policies to enhance the 'hidden innovation' in services: Evidence and lessons from the UK. Service Industries Journal. 2010. Vol. 30. No. 1. P. 99–118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02642060802236160
Arundel A., Huber D. From too little to too much innovation? Issues in measuring innovation in the public sector. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics. 2013. Vol. 27. P. 146–159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2013.06.009
Banu G.S. Measuring innovation using key performance indicators. Procedia Manufacturing. 2018. Vol. 22. P. 906–911. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.03.128
Bloch, C., Bugge, M.M. Public sector innovation – From theory to measurement. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics. 2013. Vol. 27. P. 133–145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2013.06.008.
Borrás, S., & Laatsit, M. Towards system oriented innovation policy evaluation? Evidence from EU28 member states. Research Policy. 2019. Vol. 48. No. 1. P. 312–321. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.08.020
Bund, E., Gerhard, U., Hoelscher, M., Mildenberger, G. A methodological framework for measuring social innovation. Historical Social Research. 2015. Vol. 40. No. 3. P. 48–78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12759/hsr.40.2015.3.48-78
Ciriaci D. Montresor S., Palma D. Do KIBS make manufacturing more innovative? An empirical investigation of four European countries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2015. Vol. 95. P. 135–151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.02.008
Czarnitzki D., Hanel P., Rosa J. M. Evaluating the impact of R&D tax credits on innovation: A microeconometric study on Canadian firms. Research Policy. 2011. Vol. 40. No. 2. P. 217–229. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.09.017
Damle M., Krishnamoorthy B. Identifying critical drivers of innovation in pharmaceutical industry using TOPSIS method. MethodsX. 2022. Vol. 9. № 101677. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2022.101677.
Dediu V., Leka S., Jain A. Job demands, job resources and innovative work behaviour: a European Union study. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 2018. Vol. 27. No. 3. P. 310–323. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2018.1444604
Dziallas M., Blind K. Innovation indicators throughout the innovation process: An extensive literature analysis. Technovation. 2019. Vol. 80–81. P. 3–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2018.05.005
Dziallas M. How to evaluate innovative ideas and concepts at the front-end?: A front-end perspective of the automotive innovation process. Journal of Business Research. 2020. Vol. 110. P. 502–518. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.05.008
Edquist C., Zabala-Iturriagagoitia J. M., Barbero J., Zofío J. L. On the meaning of innovation performance: Is the synthetic indicator of the Innovation Union Scoreboard flawed? Research Evaluation. 2018. Vol. 27. No. 3. P. 196–211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvy011
Frietsch R., Schmoch U. Transnational patents and international markets. Scientometrics. 2010. Vol. 82. No. 1. P. 185–200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0082-2
Gault F. Defining and measuring innovation in all sectors of the economy. Research Policy. 2018. Vol. 47. No. 3. P. 617–622. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.01.007
Grupp H., Schubert T. Review and new evidence on composite innovation indicators for evaluating national performance. Research Policy. 2010. Vol. 39. No. 1. P. 67–78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.10.002
Hauser C., Siller, M., Schatzer, T., Walde, J., Tappeiner, G. Measuring regional innovation: A critical inspection of the ability of single indicators to shape technological change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2018. Vol. 129. P. 43–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.10.019.
Janger, J., Schubert T., Andries P., Rammer C., Hoskens M. The EU 2020 innovation indicator: A step forward in measuring innovation outputs and outcomes? Research Policy. 2017. Vol. 46, No. 1. P. 30–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.10.001
Jin J., Han L. Assessment of Chinese green funds: Performance and industry allocation. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2018. Vol. 171. P. 1084–1093. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.211
Krlev G., Bund E., Mildenberger G. Measuring What Matters – Indicators of Social Innovativeness on the National Level. Information Systems Management. 2014. Vol. 31. No. 3. P. 200–224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2014.923265
Law S.H., Naseem N.A.M., Lau W.T., Trinugroho I. Can innovation improve income inequality? Evidence from panel data. Economic Systems. 2020. Vol. 44. No. 4. Article 100815. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2020.100815
Luo Y., Lu Z., Muhammad S., Yang H. The heterogeneous effects of different technological innovations on eco-efficiency: Evidence from 30 China's provinces. Ecological Indicators. 2021. Vol. 127. Article 107802. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107802
Luz L.M., de Francisco A.C., Piekarski C.M. Proposed model for assessing the contribution of the indicators obtained from the analysis of life-cycle inventory to the generation of industry innovation. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2015. Vol. 96. P. 339–348. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.03.004
Stek P., van Geenhuizen M. The influence of international research interaction on national innovation performance: A bibliometric approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2016. Vol. 110. P. 61–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.09.017
Protogerou A., Kontolaimou A., Caloghirou Y. Innovation in the European creative industries: a firm-level empirical approach. Industry and Innovation. 2017. Vol. 24. No. 6. P. 587–612. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2016.1263551
Raghupathi V., Raghupathi W. Innovation at country-level: association between economic development and patents. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship. 2017. Vol. 6. No. 1. Р. 1–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-017-0065-0
Stam E. Knowledge and entrepreneurial employees: A country-level analysis. Small Business Economics. 2013. Vol. 41. No. 4. P. 887–898. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-013-9511-y
Szücs F. Research subsidies, industry–university cooperation and innovation. Research Policy. 2018. Vol. 47. No. 7. P. 1256–1266. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.04.009
Unceta A., Castro-Spila J., García Fronti J. Social innovation indicators. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research. 2016. Vol. 29. No. 2. P. 192–204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2015.1127137
Unceta A., Castro-Spila J., García Fronti J. The three governances in social innovation. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research. 2017. Vol. 30. No. 4. P. 406–420. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2017.1279537
Veugelers R., Cincera M., Frietsch R., Rammer C., Schubert T., Pelle A., Leijten J. The Impact of Horizon 2020 on Innovation in Europe. Intereconomics. 2015. Vol. 50. No. 1. P. 4–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10272-015-0521-7
Walz R., Köhler J. Using lead market factors to assess the potential for a sustainability transition. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions. 2014. Vol. 10. P. 20–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2013.12.004
Walz R., Pfaff M., Marscheider-Weidemann F., Glöser-Chahoud S. Innovations for reaching the green sustainable development goals – where will they come from? International Economics and Economic Policy. 2017. Vol. 14. No. 3. P. 449–480. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10368-017-0386-2
Wydra S. Measuring innovation in the bioeconomy – Conceptual discussion and empirical experiences. Technology in Society. 2020. Vol. 61. Article 101242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101242
Klymenko K.V., Savostianenko M.V. (2020). Metodychni pidkhody do otsinky rezultatyvnosti ta efektyvnosti naukovo-doslidnoi diialnosti: svitova praktyka [Methodological approaches to estimating the efficiency and effectiveness of research activities: world practice]. Naukovi pratsi NDFI. Vol. 3, pp. 20–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33763/npndfi2020.03.020. (accessed 07 August 2023).
OECD / Eurostat (2018), Oslo Manual 2018: Guidelines for Collecting, Reporting and Using Data on Innovation, 4th Edition. The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities, OECD Publishing, Paris / Eurostat, Luxembourg. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264304604-en. (accessed 07 August 2023).
Abreu M., Grinevich V., Kitson M., Savona M. (2010). Policies to enhance the 'hidden innovation' in services: Evidence and lessons from the UK. Service Industries Journal. Vol. 30, pp. 99–118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02642060802236160 (accessed 07 August 2023).
Arundel A., Huber D. (2013). From too little to too much innovation? Issues in measuring innovation in the public sector. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics. Vol. 27, pp. 146–159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2013.06.009 (accessed 07 August 2023).
Banu G.S. (2018). Measuring innovation using key performance indicators. Procedia Manufacturing. Vol. 22, pp. 906–911. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.03.128 (accessed 07 August 2023).
Bloch, C., Bugge, M.M. (2013). Public sector innovation – From theory to measurement. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics. Vol. 27, pp. 133–145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2013.06.008. (accessed 07 August 2023).
Borrás, S., & Laatsit, M. (2019). Towards system oriented innovation policy evaluation? Evidence from EU28 member states. Research Policy. Vol. 48. No. 1, pp. 312–321. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.08.020 (accessed 07 August 2023).
Bund, E., Gerhard, U., Hoelscher, M., Mildenberger, G. (2015). A methodological framework for measuring social innovation. Historical Social Research. Vol. 40. No. 3, pp. 48–78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12759/hsr.40.2015.3.48-78 (accessed 07 August 2023).
Ciriaci D. Montresor S., Palma D. (2015) Do KIBS make manufacturing more innovative? An empirical investigation of four European countries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. Vol. 95, pp. 135–151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.02.008 (accessed 07 August 2023).
Czarnitzki D., Hanel pp., Rosa J. M. (2011). Evaluating the impact of R&D tax credits on innovation: A microeconometric study on Canadian firms. Research Policy. Vol. 40. No. 2, pp. 217–229. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.09.017 (accessed 07 August 2023).
Damle M., Krishnamoorthy B. (2022). Identifying critical drivers of innovation in pharmaceutical industry using TOPSIS method. MethodsX. Vol. 9. № 101677. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2022.101677 (accessed 07 August 2023).
Dediu V., Leka S., Jain A. (2018). Job demands, job resources and innovative work behaviour: a European Union study. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology Vol. 27. No. 3, pp. 310–323. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2018.1444604 (accessed 07 August 2023).
Dziallas M., Blind K. (2019). Innovation indicators throughout the innovation process: An extensive literature analysis. Technovation. Vol. 80-81, pp. 3–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2018.05.005 (accessed 07 August 2023).
Dziallas M. (2020). How to evaluate innovative ideas and concepts at the front-end?: A front-end perspective of the automotive innovation process. Journal of Business Research. Vol. 110, pp. 502–518. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.05.008 (accessed 07 August 2023).
Edquist C., Zabala-Iturriagagoitia J. M., Barbero J., Zofío J. L. (2018). On the meaning of innovation performance: Is the synthetic indicator of the Innovation Union Scoreboard flawed? Research Evaluation. Vol. 27. No. 3, pp. 196–211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvy011 (accessed 07 August 2023).
Frietsch R., Schmoch U. (2010). Transnational patents and international markets. Scientometrics. Vol. 82. No. 1, pp. 185–200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0082-2 (accessed 07 August 2023).
Gault F. (2018). Defining and measuring innovation in all sectors of the economy. Research Policy. Vol. 47. No. 3, pp. 617–622. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.01.007 (accessed 07 August 2023).
Grupp H., Schubert T. (2010). Review and new evidence on composite innovation indicators for evaluating national performance. Research Policy. Vol. 39. No. 1, pp. 67–78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.10.002 (accessed 07 August 2023).
Hauser C., Siller, M., Schatzer, T., Walde, J., Tappeiner, G. (2018). Measuring regional innovation: A critical inspection of the ability of single indicators to shape technological change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. Vol. 129, pp. 43–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.10.019 (accessed 07 August 2023).
Janger, J., Schubert T., Andries pp., Rammer C., Hoskens M. (2017). The EU 2020 innovation indicator: A step forward in measuring innovation outputs and outcomes? Research Policy. Vol. 46, No. 1, pp. 30–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.10.001 (accessed 07 August 2023).
Jin J., Han L. (2018). Assessment of Chinese green funds: Performance and industry allocation. Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 171, pp. 1084–1093. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.211 (accessed 07 August 2023).
Krlev G., Bund E., Mildenberger G. (2014). Measuring What Matters – Indicators of Social Innovativeness on the National Level. Information Systems Management. Vol. 31. No. 3, pp. 200–224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2014.923265 (accessed 07 August 2023).
Law S.H., Naseem N.A.M., Lau W.T., Trinugroho I. (2020). Can innovation improve income inequality? Evidence from panel data. Economic Systems. Vol. 44. No. 4. Article 100815. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2020.100815 (accessed 07 August 2023).
Luo Y., Lu Z., Muhammad S., Yang H. (2021). The heterogeneous effects of different technological innovations on eco-efficiency: Evidence from 30 China's provinces. Ecological Indicators. Vol. 127. Article 107802. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107802 (accessed 07 August 2023).
Luz L.M., de Francisco A.C., Piekarski C.M. (2015). Proposed model for assessing the contribution of the indicators obtained from the analysis of life-cycle inventory to the generation of industry innovation. Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 96, pp. 339–348. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.03.004 (accessed 07 August 2023).
Stek P., van Geenhuizen M. (2016) The influence of international research interaction on national innovation performance: A bibliometric approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. Vol. 110, pp. 61–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.09.017 (accessed 07 August 2023).
Protogerou A., Kontolaimou A., Caloghirou Y. (2017). Innovation in the European creative industries: a firm-level empirical approach. Industry and Innovation. Vol. 24. No. 6m pp. 587–612. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2016.1263551 (accessed 07 August 2023).
Raghupathi V., Raghupathi W. (2017). Innovation at country-level: association between economic development and patents. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Vol. 6. No. 1m pp. 1–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-017-0065-0 (accessed 07 August 2023).
Stam E. (2013). Knowledge and entrepreneurial employees: A country-level analysis. Small Business Economics. Vol. 41. No. 4, pp. 887–898. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-013-9511-y (accessed 07 August 2023).
Szücs F. (2018). Research subsidies, industry–university cooperation and innovation. Research Policy. Vol. 47. No. 7, pp. 1256–1266. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.04.009 (accessed 07 August 2023).
Unceta A., Castro-Spila J., García Fronti J. (2016). Social innovation indicators. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research. Vol. 29. No. 2, pp. 192–204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2015.1127137 (accessed 07 August 2023).
Unceta A., Castro-Spila J., García Fronti J. (2017). The three governances in social innovation. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research. Vol. 30. No. 4, pp. 406–420. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2017.1279537 (accessed 07 August 2023).
Veugelers R., Cincera M., Frietsch R., Rammer C., Schubert T., Pelle A., Leijten J. (2015). The Impact of Horizon 2020 on Innovation in Europe. Intereconomics. Vol. 50. No. 1, pp. 4–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10272-015-0521-7 (accessed 07 August 2023).
Walz R., Köhler J. (2014). Using lead market factors to assess the potential for a sustainability transition. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions. Vol. 10, pp. 20–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2013.12.004 (accessed 07 August 2023).
Walz R., Pfaff M., Marscheider-Weidemann F., Glöser-Chahoud S. (2017). Innovations for reaching the green sustainable development goals – where will they come from? International Economics and Economic Policy. Vol. 14. No. 3, pp. 449–480. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10368-017-0386-2 (accessed 07 August 2023).
Wydra S. (2020). Measuring innovation in the bioeconomy – Conceptual discussion and empirical experiences. Technology in Society. Vol. 61. Article 101242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101242 (accessed 07 August 2023).
